Devolution: Work With Us

COSLA comments on the Prime Minister’s speech on devolution

Commenting on the Prime Minister’s speech on devolution on Friday, COSLA Vice President Cllr Steven Heddle stressed the need for early and meaningful engagement with Scottish Local Government around any significant proposals for a model of regional empowerment.

Cllr Heddle said: “The Prime Minister has set out UK Government’s thinking around greater devolution to Scotland and to Local Government in particular.  

“COSLA is strongly supportive of that principle of subsidiarity, and has been actively and positively involved in discussions around regional economic partnership working, albeit not the specifics of the Prime Minister’s speech today.  

“The development of any proposals such as this must be based around meaningful engagement.  COSLA stands ready to participate fully in any discussions with both UK and Scottish Governments around the future shape of local democracy in Scotland.

“Our position remains consistent – this must be about bringing decisions closer to communities, improving local democracy and delivering better outcomes for all.  This should not be devolution imposed from the top down.

“Communities and vital staff delivering services day-in-day out must meaningfully inform the future of local services and UK Government must work with COSLA on any future devolution proposals.”

PRIME MINISTER ANDY BURNHAM’s SPEECH IN FULL:

It’s great to be with you. Thanks to the college, as Douglas says, for having us. 

It’s good to be back in Scotland, to be here in Motherwell. 

And I should say – I’m going to say this now, but I might regret it – the true north!

Please don’t tell anyone in Manchester that I said that.

You know I’ve created Number 10 North? Are you aware of that? Have you heard of that?

I know here you’ll probably call it Number 10 South. 

And then you’ve got now Number 10 South South. 

So you’re going to have to have your own way now of describing it. 

But it is brilliant to be here. 

I was in Scotland for the Opening Ceremony of the Commonwealth Games in the summer and, can I say, what a job Glasgow did in stepping forward to host it. Really grateful to them, did it brilliantly.  

I’m actually here more than you might think. I sneak into Scotland without you knowing. I was here between Christmas and New Year last year for Hibs-Hearts and it has not escaped my notice that Motherwell are currently above the former in the SPL. 

Although, well I think there are some Motherwell supporters here, surely. I hope there are. 

I care about Scotland and I am coming today with a big offer and in search of common ground.

When I walked into Downing Street in July, I said I wanted to do politics differently. Place-first not party-first. 

Honestly, I meant it. I meant it and I arrive here in that spirit because people in Scotland, in my view, deserve better from politicians and politics, as they do all over the UK, to be honest.

So that’s why I’m here. I’m here in that spirit because I want to show that politics can be better and we can work in a different way, place first, not party first. 

And I want to say something so Scotland understands this. 

I left Westminster in 2017 to become the first Mayor of Greater Manchester because I had come to see quite clearly how Westminster didn’t work for the North of England, North West of England as well. 

My work on Hillsborough had brought me to the same conclusion that Scotland had reached many years before us.

And I felt the same frustrations as Scotland, Scottish ministers, in my ten years as the mayor, because often the way we were treated wasn’t right, it wasn’t good enough. 

So I want everyone in Scotland to know that my reason in going back to Westminster is not to carry on with the same old Westminster and Whitehall ways and go back to that, I’m going back to change all of that. That’s why I’m Prime Minister. 

When I say I want good growth in every postcode, that means every single postcode in Scotland as well.

And what that requires is giving more power to people and places everywhere to change more things for themselves.

One of the most important examples of this that I have seen came not from Manchester but from somewhere not so far from here. 

In August 2023, with the help of the ground-breaking Scottish Violence Reduction Unit, I visited FARE-Scotland at Bannatyne House in Easterhouse with the Greater Manchester Violence Reduction Unit.

And we went because we’d heard all of the reports about what was happening, and the innovation that they were doing in Easterhouse. 

Many of our communities had the same challenges – unfairly labelled and, you know, given a certain reputation – and that kind of hangs over. 

But we had picked up on the stories that were coming out of things that were being done to turn people’s lives around. 

So we went to see. 

I had expected to spend two hours there talking about policing, drugs and violence.

Instead, we only talked about empowerment and opportunity.

The need to stop communities being labelled and defined by the negatives and instead to celebrate their positives and the assets that they’ve got.

It was an amazing time. I’ll never forget it. 

And also we talked about how to create personal pathways, very personal pathways, for each young person, individually tailored for them, working with local employers.

And then to help those young people take those chances up to get them the right clothes so they didn’t feel out of place when they were going to those opportunities and those appointments, or those interviews, and have their travel covered as well. 

It was something I’d never really heard explained in quite that way before. 

It was true extra mile, bottom-up, person-centred support.

Rooted in local values.

Run by the local community and the people on the estate.

And it worked.

Well, why wouldn’t it work? It would work, wouldn’t it, if you run things like that. That’s how they should be done. 

So I took everything I heard that day from Easterhouse and I took it back to Greater Manchester and I used it to pioneer what we called the Live Well model in Greater Manchester.

It was all about moving away from top-down, tick box systems that no one trusts and sometimes can make people feel worse about themselves, not better, when they’ve interacted with that system. 

It was about moving away from the often patronising approach of public services so powerfully described by Darren McGarvey in his book Poverty Safari. And if you haven’t read it, I would recommend it to you. 

And it pointed towards a new approach based on trusting local communities, and let them sort things out for themselves, because they know the solutions that they need.  

And lo and behold, just as Easterhouse had done, we began to achieve more for people than we could have imagined before through Live Well. 

So I carry all of that learning with me into my time as Prime Minister, and I am really clear about the changes I want to see. 

When I walked up Downing Street and into No10, I was determined to push power out of it – and into the hands of local people. That’s what this country needs, in my view, all over it. In all of the regions, in all of the nations. 

To rewire the state, rewire it so that it works right across the UK, and every postcode is empowered to do more for itself. 

So I will do that because in the past we saw too many people, too many places written off, powerless to fight the effects of deindustrialisation. 

And I don’t think I need to say that in this room today, with the history that there is on this site with regards to the effects of deindustrialisation. 

I don’t want anyone ever to be in the position again that this community was in 30 or so years ago. 

And it’s the reason I wanted to come to Motherwell today.

The story of this area and this town gets to the heart of why I believe we need to do things differently.

You know, it’s important to talk to Pamela today as the local MP to understand that history, but also to understand how those challenges are still there, and we know they’re very real challenges, and we want to be able to empower people here to be able to do more, to soften the effects of those things, find new solutions.

What you have here is a proud manufacturing past, and the apprentices who are with us today are obviously taking that tradition forward, and we’re proud of you, and we know you’ll go on to do great things. 

But you’ve been let down. Certainly young people in all parts of the UK have been let down by political choices made far away from here. 

By people often who have no clue, really, about what life is like here. 

So that is basically the history. 

You know, in the past, if you think about this area, if Britain was building something big the fair chance was the steel would have come from here. 

You know, it was the heart of an industrial Britain. 

And this college, I think I’m right in saying, is on the very site where Ravenscraig once stood. 

And in my youth, if I go back to the 70s and 80s, you couldn’t not hear that name, Ravenscraig, on the news, such was its massive importance to the country. 

When it closed, it wasn’t just a works that shut.

It was a whole community which saw the pillars underneath it just taken away, collapse beneath it. 

And that was a decision taken hundreds of miles away by people, without any real consequences for what that would mean for people here. 

Taken by people who would never have to live with those consequences and see those consequences every day. 

And more than thirty years on, I know that work is still ongoing to fill the Ravenscraig site, such is the hole that it left.  

And I know that story myself, as well. 

Because I represented a former mining community, Leigh in the old Lancashire coalfield, and I was the MP there for sixteen years from the early 2000s, just after the pits had shut in the 1990s.

It broke my heart to see the old miners shuffling into my surgery every week carrying oxygen bottles still struggling to get compensation for the damage that was done to their lungs

It pained me to drive past the wasteland around Bickershaw Colliery, one of the last pits to close in Leigh.

Nobody asked Leigh what was going to come next either.

No one in Whitehall went to Leigh and said, “Here’s what we’re going to do with transition”. Just gone. 

And this is the way the UK has been run in our lifetimes, and it’s what needs to change.

It took so much, this country, from Motherwell and its people in terms of the building of Britain. 

And it took so much from Leigh in terms of the powering of Britain, and then just abandoned them when life moved on.

So I am here today to spell out how I plan to do things differently as Prime Minister in all parts of the UK.

Taking power out of the centre, and putting it into places like this, empowering people. 

Because that to me  is just as important in Scotland as it is anywhere else in the UK.

All of the nations that make up the UK, including Scotland, are too unequal internally. 

Like in England, public transport in Scotland is way better in the capital of Scotland than it is in any other city or town in Scotland. 

Or if you look at high streets. 

If you go to Edinburgh today, you’ll see around one in twenty shops lying empty.

But if you go to Dundee, it’s more likely one in five.

Again, not an accident.

It’s what happens when too many of the good jobs go.

When the spending power reduces, and then obviously the high streets suffer and the shops go. 

And people in Aberdeen are living through that now, and they’re very much on my mind, and I’ll have more to say about that in due course. 

If you look at population in Scotland, there are places that haven’t grown like the rest of Scotland, where if you say in the West like Inverclyde, the working population has shrunk.

And why? It’s because it’s what happens when young people can’t see a future for themselves in those areas, and then they move away to find it.

And this one should really give us pause for thought: life expectancy.

It’s wonderful to see the emphasis being put in this college, if I could say this to the principal, on brain health. 

Really asking every student to think about health. 

I think that’s such a powerful message that you’re sending. 

But the truth is we need to do that because the health inequalities are still far too wide. 

A man in East Renfrewshire can live, as I understand, on average seven years longer than a man in Glasgow, even though there is only ten miles between the two places. 

It’s the same elsewhere, in all parts of the country. 

You can just go a few miles and you can see the housing change, you can see the community change, and of course you can see then the health of the people is not what it should be. 

And when people live in a country like that, where it doesn’t feel fair place to place, that’s what then creates the divides that people see, and then it damages people’s trust, and they don’t feel the country is fair to all people and to all places. 

Because when you’ve watched the works go, when you’ve watched the jobs go, the high street become empty, and one government after another tell you that things will get better, why should anybody believe any of us?

And it means we’ve got to change first. Politicians have to change. 

Write a new script, do things very differently, because it’s not been working, what we’ve been doing. 

We spend a lot of time focusing on the differences between Scotland and England.

But what is perhaps more striking is how similar the problems in places across Scotland and England.  

The same cost-of-living pressures and lack of good jobs.

The same huge gaps between the regions.

The same decline sometimes seen on the high streets. 

And the same sense that where you live still has too much bearing on your life as a whole.

And the issue was never the regions themselves. 

They never lacked potential.

Ambition…

Talent…

Drive.

It’s just that the country, at a national level – UK level, Holyrood level – has not often shared the same ambitions of those places and empowered them to achieve those ambitions. 

For decades, the centre sown in London has looked past too many places.

And hasn’t trusted people in those places to make their own decisions about their future.

And that centre has also refused to give up power when it’s been asked to do so. It’s kept hold of the power even when places across the country have been desperate for more ability to do more for themselves. 

Twenty-seven years on, you led the way on devolution here in Scotland with the creation of the Scottish Parliament.

And that was absolutely right.

But devolution was never meant to stop there.

It was never supposed to stop at the doors of the Scottish Parliament.

Obviously, there’s huge progress to look back on. 

Public control of water…

Public ownership of rail…

Free personal care…

And these are all Issues very close to my own heart, and I applaud them…

But they were always meant – as I understand it, because I was in Parliament, as Douglas said, at the time with him – always meant to be the start of something deeper.

The foundations of a nation where communities had more of a say in their own future…

And where the norm was always to push power out until it reached every person and every post code.

Instead, we’ve ended up with the situation where Scotland, the most devolved nation in the UK, is itself one of the most centralised nations in Europe.

And I don’t say that to score points.

Genuinely, I don’t. 

I say that because I believe we need to be honest about that if we really want to get growth in every post code, if we really want to renew every part of the United Kingdom. 

That’s why one of the first things I did as Prime Minister was start shifting that power out of Westminster.

And already we’re giving local leaders in England more power and control over transport…

More say over skills and investment…

More freedom to build an economy around the strengths of their communities.

We’re finally making the centre work for people…

Rather than asking them to work around us.

And this is what I mean by devolution by default, and deep devolution. 

Not swapping power from one parliament to another…

But going deeper.

Putting power down into the regions…

Control back into the hands of the local people who know how to use it best.

And as our English regions see the benefits…

I want those same opportunities for Scotland and Scottish regions.

The chance to stop looking back what was once here…

And start looking forward to what’s coming next.

And that does mean something different for both governments, the UK government and the Scottish government. 

This is the heart of what I wanted to say to you today. 

It means working together in a different way and backing places in a different way across Scotland, and giving them the necessary investment to bring forward a new vision for the reindustrialisation of Scotland that these young people who are with us today can feel hopeful about. 

It is great that the Scottish government has this week agreed to match the UK government’s £10 million to create two defence technical excellence colleges, and Douglas informed me of that news today. 

So there will be one in the east and one in the west. 

That’s an example, I think, of how it should be done. 

The UK government and the Scottish government making something bigger than it might otherwise have been if one of them had done it alone. 

And credit to Douglas and John Swinney for working together on that. 

It means Scots trained for well-paid, skilled jobs in a defence sector that already supports 12,000 jobs here in Scotland

My government’s job is to do whatever we can to support more of those high ambitions in every part of Scotland.

It’s why we’re backing Scottish shipbuilding.

It’s why we’re working with the Scottish government to help secure new investment and new opportunities for the Grangemouth site. And we will keep working hard at that. 

And it’s why we are committed to ensuring the next generation of energy jobs, created right here in Scotland.

Because I know how much these industries matter to people.

To workers.

To their families.

And to the communities they have built around them.

It’s also why I am working on a new deal for food and farming at the EU-UK Summit on the 20th of November. 

I am working closely with our EU partners in relation to that. Why? Because it would have hugely beneficial impacts on the food industry and farming here in Scotland.

And it is why I want to see a change in public procurement across the UK and working with the devolved governments, the same there.

When I was Mayor of Greater Manchester, I put buses back under public control, and it meant I had the ability to choose where the buses we bought were built, and I chose Scotland.

I chose to back Scottish manufacturing. 

I rejected the old Whitehall way of always going to find the cheapest contract anywhere in the world, because I recognised if you paid even a little more, it would still have circular benefits for British communities. 

So I was determined that the buses on the roads of Greater Manchester today were built by Alexander Dennis in Falkirk. 

And I did that because I knew it would sustain those communities. And Euan was there with me when we announced some of those contracts. 

I want all public procurement in the UK to work like that, to follow the same approach and back a plan, a solid plan, to reindustrialise all of Britain. 

But, from there, we have to allow our own regions to forge their own future, and that means Westminster and Holyrood learning to let go and make decisions about what comes next themselves.

The good news is Scotland’s regions already have so many strengths to build on.

In Dundee, you’ve got a world-leading video games industry.

Across the Highlands and the Islands, you’re building a new space industry, with new launch sites emerging.

In Edinburgh, a thriving fintech sector.

The list goes on.

Imagine what more places could achieve if they had greater control and investment to help those businesses grow.

If the people who understood those industries best had more say over where the money went, and which opportunities they went after, they would be building more stronger technical education paths, education paths into their emerging sectors.

We’ve already seen glimpses of what that can look like.

An approach that puts local businesses, universities and councils in the driving seat has seen companies like Chemify turn groundbreaking research into real manufacturing jobs in Glasgow.

And that’s the sort of thing I want to see so much more of.

It’s why we’re putting a billion pounds into research and innovation across the UK in the coming years.

But I don’t want all the decisions about where that money goes being made in Whitehall.

We’re already giving English mayors more control over funding for local innovation.

And I want to explore now how Scotland’s regions can have the same powers to decide where more of that research and development investment goes. 

Because the people building these industries, they know where those industries can go in the future. 

Our job isn’t to stand in their way…

It’s to give them what they need to go after those opportunities.

And there’s one more thing.

Because none of this means very much if the people growing up in these communities don’t get the chance to take up the opportunities that come out of it.

We can announce all the investment we like and all of the big numbers. 

We can build factories…

We can win contracts…

We can create new businesses.

But if a young person down the road growing up here can’t get the skills or support they need to work there…

Then we haven’t got it right.

And right now, too many young people are missing out.

I mean, none of us feel comfortable about these statistics, and it’s the same in England, I’m not pointing the finger at Scotland. 

But the fact is around one in six young people here are not in education, employment or training.

It just isn’t right, is it? It isn’t good enough. 

All of those young people experiencing that feeling of less hope and not having a sense of direction for the future. 

I’ve been clear that care for people is at the heart of everything that I’m about and what my government will do.

And I won’t have a country where we get comfortable with the idea of kids in their 20s just being there on benefits. 

I won’t. I never will accept that some are just written off, given the feeling that they don’t matter or they’re not seen. 

I don’t believe the answer is another scheme designed in the centre – another top-down scheme – and then kind of imposed on every community in the way that we’ve done it in the past. 

It won’t work again. We’ve heard it before. 

The review led by Alan Milburn is challenging us to look at this very differently.

To build a system based on the Easterhouse principle of names not numbers.

Build it from the bottom up. 

Let communities build it. They know best. 

And this is what I’m here to say. I think the time has come for deeper devolution in Scotland to empower all of the proud places across this wonderful nation, every single bit of it. 

More power to do more, and that unlocks a feeling of positivity that you can do something to change the place where you live. 

That’s what I want to see. More power to give people the support they need to access opportunities as they become available in new industries.

And, crucially, treat them as an individual.

I come back to that phrase, names not numbers.

That’s what you can do when you work from the bottom up, as they did in Easterhouse. 

You can just think about the person in front of you, not sometimes the “computer says no” approach where you just give them bad news. 

Come at it a different way, see what they’ve got, and then help them unlock all of that potential.

Don’t see them as a problem to be managed via a programme designed and implemented from Westminster or Holyrood. 

Because the barriers a young person faces in Glasgow, they won’t necessarily be the same as someone growing up in the Highlands.

And the opportunities in Dundee won’t be the same as those in Lanarkshire. That’s just a fact. 

I want to work with the Scottish government and Scottish local government to join up colleges, employers, employment support and local services.

And just like Scotland did in Easterhouse.

And just like we did in Greater Manchester, let’s create a new way of supporting people. 

That’s the vision everybody. I hope it resonates: a revitalised Scotland in a reindustrialised UK, where every region plays their part, and there are new paths for people in every post code across the UK.

I want all areas of Scotland to be part of that and to feel the possibility that they can be part of that, to play their part. 

And I open out a hand to the Scottish government, perhaps not in a way that people in my job have come and done in the past, but I do. 

Because I am long in my political career now, and I know enough now to know that tribal politics and point-scoring in the end doesn’t get you anywhere  

Politicians like to do it, but the public can’t bear it because it just doesn’t work. 

Problem-solving, not point-scoring is what I said when I walked up Downing Street and I mean it, and I’m going to stick to it. And you can all hold me to account on it. 

I know progress has been made here over the last decade with the City Region Deals.

But it is time to think about what comes next.

And how we build on them for the next generation.

We need to look at the resources and decision-making powers that sit at the regional level in Scotland so that no Scottish city regions are left behind.

And I know the Scottish government has also announced a long-term programme for local government reform.

But, if you ask me, we’ve got to move faster and we’ve got to do more. 

Growth won’t wait. 

And if we don’t move now, Scotland could lose out. 

There is a risk that some of the towns and the cities become underpowered when some of the towns and cities of the North of England are going the other way and starting to power up, and I don’t want to see that as Prime Minister. 

I want everywhere to do well. And I think everywhere can do well. 

I do want good growth in every postcode here and the rest of the UK.

And I want to work with the First Minister to deliver it. 

Because, the fact is we won’t agree on everything and we’re not going to and we shouldn’t try because there are some things we will disagree on. 

But that does not mean just because you can’t agree on everything it doesn’t mean you can’t agree on anything. 

We can agree on some things, and I know that because I’ve worked with John over a long period of time as well. 

In my mind, the real question is not whether we should try and work together… 

The real question is why on earth we wouldn’t we?

It would only be party politics that would stop that, and that’s not a good enough reason not to try and work together. 

So today I want to make a serious and genuine offer to the Scottish Government.

I want to move on from the old politics of conflict…

To bring people together….

Across governments and in Scotland… 

Alongside Number 10 North….

Or Number 10 South to you…

And in the immediate months ahead, I want us to design a new model, together, of regional economic empowerment across all of Scotland. 

One that puts control where it should be, in the hands of local people.

And if it’s going to really mean something, it has to be thorough.

At the UK-level, we are looking at how we can devolve innovation, enterprise and employability funding so that that can be used to be matched to the strengths of Scotland’s people and places to create new industries and jobs.

And let me just be really specific about this.

It goes back to what I said about that book, Poverty Safari. 

Because I read that and it had a big impact on me. 

You know, it makes people feel really remote, doesn’t it, from the powers that be and those making decisions? 

So I’m going to be specific and make an offer today. 

An offer of DWP devolution. 

I want to offer Scotland a model of localised employment support, similar to the one in England but obviously shaped by Holyrood and one that’s right for Scotland, not repeating that. 

Because that’s a classic example of where the UK government should work with the Scottish government. 

If you want the best employment support, not a tick-box system, then it has to go deep. It has to go right down. In other words, it has to be based on the Easterhouse principle. Has to be. 

Names not numbers. If it’s not based on that, it won’t work. It will just be repeating the same system in a different way. 

But I want to give Scotland the power to take the Easterhouse model nationwide here 

Not a project on one estate, but the way we support everybody, everywhere. 

And we should absolutely explore how to give Scotland’s regions the ability to develop the skills, the transport systems and investment, the infrastructure, the housing, everything they need to make sure the areas here are set up to deliver their full potential.

So in a couple of weeks, the National Economic Council will meet with the First Ministers of Scotland and Wales, and the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, and we will do that for the first time since I became Prime Minister to put that offer on the table and to see if we can work out a plan together.

I think that feels different. I hope you sense that too as you hear me lay it out. 

And my message to John is simple: 

I want to push economic power out into the regions of Scotland. 

Do you? Do you? 

Because, if you do, let’s agree on it. Let’s agree a new process, working with Douglas and working with John’s team. Let’s agree on a new proposal that’s right for Scotland, and we work together on it. 

Let’s have both of Scotland’s governments coming together with a joint ambition to push power out from the centre – from Westminster and Holyrood –  and put it into the hands of local people. 

And together, let’s reindustrialise Scotland.

Because I absolutely know that it can be done. 

And I’ll finish on this point, you’ll be glad to hear. I’ve had a lot to say, and I wanted to say it directly so you understood fully where I am coming from. 

Here’s the thing, how much time have we wasted – and I’m thinking about my visits as a politician to Scotland – how much time have we wasted just debating what differentiates us, rather than saying, right, what can we agree on and let’s talk about that, rather than talking about the other stuff. 

And I think the time has come for that. 

The country is not in a position to carry on putting politics before places and politics before people. 

It’s not in a position. We can all see and feel that. 

We need to build our prosperity everywhere. 

We need to get the growth going everywhere. 

And that’s the thing. If we get this right in this moment, we will all spend more time in the years ahead talking about the exciting things that are happening in all of the different places in Scotland, and less about politics and political dramas.

And after all, isn’t that the best thing of all that politicians could do for the people, to stop you having to worry about politics and all of us talking about how we build a better future together?

So thank you for listening, everybody. Thank you for letting me speak to you today. I am really taken by the fact that so many people are here, so many people are listening. 

Is there a feeling that we make this a moment of change? Is that what people want? 

And do you think you speak for people around Scotland? Does everyone want a moment of change? The two governments working together?

Well, let’s do it then.

Edinburgh is being ‘short-changed’ by £147 MILLION

Ian Murray and Daniel Johnson call for more power and funding 

Ian Murray and Daniel Johnson, the MP for Edinburgh South and MSP for Edinburgh Southern, have called for increased power and funding for Edinburgh, as new analysis shows the city has been short-changed by £147 million since 2014.

New analysis from the House of Commons Library found that if local government funding in Scotland had kept pace with the Scottish block grant, Scottish Councils would be £2bn better off.

Scottish Labour is arguing for more power and funding to be pushed out of Holyrood and into local communities.

Commenting, Ian Murray said: “Edinburgh is Scotland’s worst-funded local authority, receiving less funding per resident than every other council in the country. Everyone knows a road with a pothole that needs fixed, a school that needs more support for children with additional support needs, or a high street that needs local investment. 

“Instead of empowering local communities and opening up politics and decision making to communities here, the SNP has chosen to hoard power and money in Holyrood and deprive areas of funding which would have made a real difference to the lives of local people.”

Daniel Johnson MSP said: “Too much money and control is centralised in Scotland, we need to reverse that and push funding and powers out of Holyrood and into local communities.”

‘Intense engagement’ shaping Scotland’s public sector reform

IMPROVING SERVICES?

A period of intense engagement is underway to ensure streamlined public services are delivered for Scotland, Public Service Reform Secretary Ivan McKee has said.

This week’s Programme for Government set out how the Scottish Government plans to deliver stronger and efficient public services that are sustainable for generations to come.

Plans include replacing the current 14 territorial health boards with two strategic health boards, removing unnecessary duplication and overlap in public services and seeking a clear shared direction on substantial reform to local governance, including social care.

Mr McKee said: “Public service reform is at the heart of this Government’s priorities for the next five years and this work will help to ensure that every pound of investment is focused on frontline delivery, with the right staff in the right roles to deliver real improvements in public services.

“I will meet public sector leaders and other key partners at the Public Service Reform Summit later this month to discuss the challenges and opportunities posed by public service reform and the agenda set-out in the Programme for Government.

“My colleagues and I are also engaged in intensive dialogue with public bodies, NHS Boards, local government, trade unions, the third sector, businesses and communities to strengthen the work that is already taking place and to ensure that proactive leadership and collaboration are central to our approach.

“Our focus over the coming months is to build a shared understanding of how we will deliver the changes necessary to support the needs of diverse communities across Scotland.”

COSLA President, Councillor Shona Morrison, has responded to Scottish Government’s Programme for Government plans: “The Programme for Government is a significant statement of the Scottish Government’s priorities, and we will take time to consider its detail carefully.

“There are important implications for local government and council services, particularly the proposed NHS reforms and what they will mean for the future delivery of social care.

“Over the coming days, COSLA will engage closely with our member councils and with Scottish Ministers to ensure these proposals are focused on what is best for communities across Scotland and respect the democratic legitimacy of local government.

“Public services work best when decisions are taken as close to communities as possible. We look forward to meaningful engagement with the Scottish Government and believe that the dialogue on the future of local governance must be carried forward with councils and COSLA as the collective voice of local government.”

STUC: Programme for Government ‘reckless rather than revolutionary’

Commenting on the Programme for Government, STUC General Secretary Roz Foyer said: “Presenting the public with a misleading choice of cuts packaged as public service reform was disingenuous at best and a falsehood at worst from the Scottish Government.

“Crushing down Scotland’s health boards into two may seem bold on paper but further centralising power when local communities are crying out for health and social care services tailored to their needs seems more reckless than revolutionary.

“This is not the way to do public sector reform. Before the axe is swung on any public service, whether health, council or social care, Scottish Government ministers would do well to engage meaningfully and purposefully with the workers who deliver on the ground.  This cannot be done in the timescales outlined. 

“Measures on food cap prices, childcare, breakfast clubs and bus fare caps are welcome. However, by avoiding the big decisions on wealth redistribution – on council tax reform, wealth taxes and taking national stakes in our energy infrastructure – cost of living measures will always fall short of the radical transformation both our economy and communities require.

“We will be engaging actively with Government on its promise to bring forward a responsible strategy for data centres in Scotland. We need to take stock of how such projects can benefit decent jobs, workers and the communities in which they will reside. We need to move away from industrial strategy that allows our heavy industry, manufacturing and renewables sectors to be sold off to the highest bidders with little public benefit in return.

“Finally, it’s deeply welcome the First Minister has pledged further support for survivors of gender-based violence. It’s time that all organisations, employers and society as a whole adopts a zero-tolerance approach to violence against women and girls and it’s correct that this is a strategic priority for the Scottish Government in which the First Minister will find support from Scotland’s trade unions.”

Programme for Government 2026 to 2031 – gov.scot

Candidates confirmed for Edinburgh by-elections

The candidates standing in the upcoming Southside/Newington (Ward 15) and Portobello/Craigmillar (Ward 17) by-elections have been confirmed.

23 candidates will stand in these by-elections, which will elect one new councillor per ward, on Thursday 3 September 2026.

The candidates standing for election in the Southside/Newington ward are:

  • Ruth Elliot: SCOTTISH LABOUR PARTY
  • Derrick Emms: EDINBURGH & EAST LOTHIAN PEOPLE
  • Isabella Gastel Alejandre: SCOTTISH GREENS
  • Roisin Keirdashian: INDEPENDENT
  • Artie Khovanov: SCOTTISH LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
  • Nick Layden: SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST
  • Richard Crewe Lucas: SCOTTISH FAMILY PARTY – CHRISTIAN VALUES
  • Sam Alexander Mackenzie: SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY (SNP)
  • Sean McGregor Moffat: ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM
  • Gary Neill: REFORM UK
  • Markham Rowbotham: EDINBURGH & EAST LOTHIAN PEOPLE
  • Richard Shillcock: COMMUNIST PARTY OF BRITAIN
  • Marc Wilkinson: EDINBURGH & EAST LOTHIAN PEOPLE

The candidates standing for election in the Portobello/Craigmillar ward are:

  • David Craig Ballantine: ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM
  • Niel Deepnarain: SCOTTISH FAMILY PARTY – CHRISTIAN VALUES
  • Pete Gregson: WORKERS PARTY OF BRITIAN
  • Lorenzo Martinico: SCOTTISH GREENS
  • Silas McGilvray: SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY (SNP)
  • Andrew McLaughlin: REFORM UK
  • Peter Olech: COMMUNIST PARTY OF BRITAIN
  • Liss Owen: SCOTTISH LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
  • Jim Patrick Wyke: SCOTTISH LABOUR PARTY
  • Haris Young: SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST

The final candidate lists and further information are also available on the Council website.

Returning Officer for the City of Edinburgh, Paul Lawrence said: “With nominations now closed and just over a month to go until polling day, residents in these wards can start thinking about who they will vote for.

“Councillors play a key role in our democratic system, making crucial decisions that impact our city.

“I’d encourage everyone who is eligible to register to vote in plenty of time, and then make their voices heard in September.”

Poll cards will be delivered to registered voters in the area from today, with further information on when and where to vote.

If you live in these wards, the deadline to register to vote in these by-elections is 18 August. For new postal vote applications, it’s 19 August and for new proxy votes it’s 26 August.

Find out more about registering to vote on the Council website.

The election will use the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system, where voters rank candidates in order of preference, rather than using a single cross. Voters can rank as many or as few candidates as they like.

Polling places will be open from 7am to 10pm on Thursday 3 September.

Please check your polling place as this may have changed since the last time you voted. If you bring your polling card to vote this will help us and speed up the process, but this isn’t mandatory.

Polling Places (Ward 15):

  • Nelson Hall Community Centre (New for 2026)
  • Blackford and Grange Parish Church Centre
  • St. Catherine’s Argyle Church
  • Newington Trinity Church
  • Reid Memorial Church Hall
  • 75th Braid Scouts’ Millar Hall
  • Cameron House Community Education Centre

Polling Places (Ward 17):

  • Portobello Library (New for 2026)
  • Branch Out Together
  • St Mark’s Episcopal Church (New for 2026)
  • Bingham Community Centre
  • St Martins Parish Church
  • Craigmillar Library
  • Hays Business Centre
  • Newcraighall Leith Victoria FC

The electronic count will take place at Waverley Court, starting at the close of poll at 10pm on September 3. 

COSLA calls for clarity over severance scheme for councillors

COSLA has responded to the Scottish Government’s decision not to proceed with a consultation and legislation for a severance scheme for councillors:

The COSLA President has written to the Deputy First Minister to express COSLA’s ‘profound disappointment’ in the Government’s position that a severance scheme for elected members cannot be implemented ahead of the 2027 local government election.

Commenting on the Government’s decision not to proceed with a consultation and legislation, Cllr Morrison said: “The Scottish Government’s position represents a significant departure from the expectation created by the Scottish Local Authorities Renumeration Committee (SLARC) recommendation and by the Scottish Government’s own acceptance of the recommendation.

“COSLA is clear that a severance scheme for elected members, which would bring councillors in line with what is already available for MSPs and MPs, is a key part of removing barriers to elected office and increasing the diversity and representation of local government.

“COSLA remains committed to delivering the SLARC recommendations, which includes severance, and working constructively with the Scottish Government to deliver this important reform.

“Scotland’s councillors now require a formal commitment by the Scottish Government detailing how they will take forward this recommendation in future.

“Such clarity would help provide reassurance regarding the Government’s continuing commitment to strengthening local democracy and removing barriers to elected office.”

Town Hall Rich List 2026: record 4,733 council bosses received over £100,000 last year

  • Town Hall Rich List 2026 findsthat a record 4,733 council employees received over £100,000 remuneration in 2024-25, with 1,255 receiving over £150,000 in total remuneration in 2024-25, another record. 
  • The TaxPayers’ Alliance (TPA) provides a council-by-council breakdown of local government executive pay deals. A regional breakdown is available in this press release.
  • Click here for frequently asked questions about the Town Hall Rich List.

In the wake of the largest council tax increase since 2004, the TaxPayers’ Alliance (TPA) launches its Town Hall Rich List 2026 (THRL), the 20th edition of the project. THRL is the only comprehensive list of its kind with a council-by-council breakdown of local government executive pay deals.

The number of council bosses receiving more than £100,000 in 2024-25 stood at 4,733, the highest level since this dataset was first published in 2007 and 827 more than last year’s edition. This is an increase of over 21 per cent on last year, as council wage bills continue to grow.

In contrast, the Yorkshire and the Humber region saw the smallest increase in the number of employees receiving over £100,000, rising by 2 per cent from 204 to 209.

The number of staff receiving over £150,000 has also hit a record high of 1,255. This is a 14.9 per cent increase from last year and almost twenty times more than in the first edition of THRL when Tony Blair was prime minister. The THRL reveals there were 320 council employees who received a higher salary than the prime minister was entitled to in 2024-25.

The highest remunerated council employee in 2024-25 was from Staffordshire council, who received around £457,500. The name and job title of this individual were not provided, nor was the breakdown of what this figure encompassed, though they were a council employee and not teaching staff.

Councils have routinely increased council tax by 4.99 per cent each year, the maximum before a local referendum is mandatory in England, often citing stretched budgets and increased demands.

Despite budget shortfalls, councils have been able to consistently find ever-increasing amounts to pay senior staff. Local councils employed more than double the number of senior managers as the NHS did the year before.

Six councils that issued Section 114 bankruptcy notices since 2020 had 124 council employees receiving over £100,000. 

Some increases in the figures are partially driven by an increase in the number of councils that have published accounts compared to the 2025 edition of this list.

In a positive move towards more transparency, the number who failed to publish accounts in time for this year fell from 15 to five.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL REPORT

Key findings:

  • In 2024-25, there were at least 4,733 council employees receiving £100,000 or more in total remuneration. This is a 21.2 per cent increase from 2023-24, representing 827 more people and compared to 2005-06, there were eight times more people in this category. Of these, 1,255 council employees had total remuneration of at least £150,000 in 2024-25, which represents a 14.9 per cent increase or 163 more people from 2023-24. Compared to 2005-06, there were almost twenty times more people in this category.
  • At least 366 local authority employees had total remuneration of at least £200,000 in 2024-25. This is a 39.7 per cent increase from 2023-24, representing 104 people. In 2005-06, there were five people in this category.
  • The prime minister had a salary entitlement of £172,153 in 2024.  320 council employees received a higher salary than this in 2024-25, as opposed to total remuneration. This is a third more than in 2023-24.
  • A total of five councils did not provide accounts for 2024-25. This is lower than previous years, with 15 not producing 2023-24 accounts in time for last year’s note, which was significantly down from 59 in 2022-23.
     
  • In 2024-25, the highest remunerated council employee was from Staffordshire council, who received £457,500. The name and job title of this individual were not provided, nor was the breakdown of what this figure encompassed.
  • The council employee with the largest compensation for loss of office payment in 2024-25 was the unnamed assistant chief executive at Cambridge council, who received £222,559 in compensation and £330,101 in total remuneration.
  • Elaine Allergretti, strategic director, children and adults at Barking and Dagenham council, received the largest bonus payment in 2024-25, at £34,161, with total remuneration of £232,923.
  • Westminster council was the local authority with the most staff receiving over £100,000 in 2024-25. The council had 92 such individuals, 19 more than 2023-24. This is a twelve-fold increase from 2005-06, when the council had seven council employees receiving over £100,000 in total remuneration.
  • Yorkshire and the Humber saw the smallest increase in the number of employees receiving over £100,000 total remuneration from 2023-24 to 2024-25, rising by two per cent from 204 to 209.
  • Six councils have issued section 114 notices since 2020, effectively declaring bankruptcy. There were 124 employees in these councils receiving over £100,000 in total remuneration in 2024-25. Of these, Claire Demmel, interim executive director of place at Thurrock council, had the largest total remuneration in 2024-25, at £283,844.
  • From 2005-06 to 2024-25, band D council tax has risen by 120 per cent in Wales, 79 per cent in England and 30 per cent in Scotland.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL REPORT

John O’Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers are caught in a pincer movement with a record-breaking tax burden on one side and a bloated public sector feathering its nest on the other.

“Our latest Town Hall Rich List exposes a surging class of council bosses enjoying six-figure packages, even as they plead poverty, slash frontline services, and hike council tax bills far beyond inflation.

“Residents can see exactly how many local bureaucrats are receiving plush packages and judge for themselves whether they’re getting value for money.”

In Scotland:

  • Scotland had 369 council employees who received at least £100,000 in 2024-25, which is 24 more than the previous year.
  • The highest remunerated council employee was Katrina Hassell, chief officer (business and digital) of North Lanarkshire council, who received £281,680.

Working Towards Achieving a More Balanced Population in Scotland

COSLA LAUNCHES FIRST IN A SERIES OF WHITE PAPERS

COSLA has launched Working Towards Achieving a More Balanced Population in Scotland, the first in a series of white papers to be published in advance of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election.

Scottish councils are facing increasingly complex and deeply rooted population challenges, and COSLA is calling for urgent, coordinated action to address them.

This paper provides a detailed examination of these issues and sets out practical recommendations across key policy areas to support a more sustainable and balanced population.

Launching the paper, COSLA described achieving population balance as a central priority for Scottish local government.

With some areas experiencing rapid growth, others facing significant depopulation, and many managing both pressures simultaneously within their boundaries, the need for strategic intervention has never been greater.

COSLA Community Wellbeing Spokesperson, Cllr Maureen Chalmers, said: “I am delighted to be launching our population white paper today.

“Achieving a more balanced population is a priority for Scottish Local Government and COSLA, and it is imperative that this remains a priority for the new Scottish Government administration following the election.

“Our white paper highlights the diverse population challenges faced by councils across Scotland, from those that are experiencing rapid population growth, to those facing critical depopulation, as well as the many dealing with both challenges within their council area. It proposes recommendations across three key priority areas: economy, workforce and jobs; housing; and transport.

“Scottish councils are best placed to lead population balance efforts but require support from both Scottish and UK Government to achieve our aims.

“We are calling on our national politicians to commit to working with us to implement the recommendations that we have set out today.”

Population White Paper

Population White Paper – Executive Summary

EIS Formally Issues Industrial Action Notice in Teacher Workload Dispute

The EIS has issued formal 10-day notice of its intention to call its members to take industrial action over workload. 

The industrial action will include national days of strike action, additional days of strike action in key target areas, and an ongoing national programme of Action Short of Strike (ASOS).

The issuing of 10-day notice is a legal requirement, and must be issued before any industrial action can commence. The issuing of notice does not compel the EIS to undertake strike action, but enables it to call its members out should a resolution to the dispute not be achieved within the next 10 days. 

Whilst the EIS recognises the progress in negotiations made in the last 24 hours, following this week’s EIS statutory ballot result, a firm agreement from the Scottish Government and COSLA to work together to deliver past promises on teacher workload and jobs, has not been forthcoming.

Commenting, EIS General Secretary Andrea Bradley said, “In issuing these formal notices of the intent to commence industrial action, the EIS is complying with the legal requirement to give notice of such action.

“This allows us to keep our options open, within the confines of current trade union law, and retain the option to call on our members to take industrial action, should it be required to ensure a resolution to this long-running dispute.

“Some progress has been made in the past 24 hours but so far, we have nothing in writing to reflect the commitment of the Scottish Government and COSLA to deliver on past promises.”

Ms Bradley continued, “The EIS remains fully committed to seeking a negotiated solution to this dispute, and will remain available in the coming days and before the closing of this 10-day window for meaningful discussion with the Scottish Government and local authority employers, through COSLA.

“We would urge those other parties to use this window wisely, and to move swiftly to ensure that an agreement can be reached to end this dispute, in the best interests of learners and teachers across Scotland.”

Ms Bradley added, “What we need to see from the Scottish Government and COSLA is surety over what they are offering to teachers. “After five years of waiting, and more than a year in dispute, Scotland’s teachers and the EIS will expect to see a firm and binding commitment, in writing and signed by all parties, before we are willing to remove the prospect of industrial action being undertaken in Scotland’s schools.”

Further information on the specific planned dates for industrial action will be issued next week. 

Responding to the EIS announcement that the teachers’ union has received a mandate for industrial action over teacher workload, Cllr Ricky Bell, COSLA Resources Spokesperson said: “COSLA notes the outcome of the EIS ballot for industrial action about reducing the weekly time teachers spend delivering lessons. With Scottish Government, COSLA continue to engage with the unions on the subject.

“Industrial action is in nobody’s interests, and we urge unions to work with COSLA and Scottish Government to find a solution all parties can agree rather that threaten to disrupt education at this crucial time of year.

“We recognise that supporting teachers is essential. However, this needs to be facilitated in a way that ensures a positive impact on outcomes for children and young people.

“COSLA remains committed to constructive engagement with the Scottish Government and teaching unions through the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) on the implementation of the Ministerial commitment to reduce class contact time.

“Concerns about the financial and practical implications of this policy remain. RCCT cannot be delivered without full funding and a clear understanding of its impact on children and young people.”

Edinburgh’s Budget: Councillors agree record spend to tackle housing emergency and reduce poverty

Thousands of new homes are set to be delivered in Edinburgh over the next five years thanks to an additional £1.6 billion agreed by councillors yesterday.

The Council’s Budget, passed on 26 February, includes a record spend on providing affordable housing alongside significant investment in frontline services, children and education.

Ending poverty and protecting vulnerable residents is at the heart of the spending plans, which prioritise homelessness prevention, sustaining Edinburgh’s third sector partnerships and investing significant sums in education and health and social care services.

Thanks to a change in loan financing arrangements, officers have been able to address budgetary challenges and preserve frontline services while enabling members to limit Edinburgh’s Council Tax rise to 4% – set to be the lowest increase across Scottish councils this year.

Councillors also agreed a freeze on most fees and charges for the next 12 months, including parking permit and pay and display charges.

Alongside today’s decision, the Edinburgh Visitor Levy scheme, the first set of spend programmes of which were agreed earlier this month, is set to generate an additional up to £29 million this financial year to help sustain and promote Edinburgh’s status as one of the world’s favourite visitor destinations.

Council Leader Jane Meagher said: “I’m proud that we’ve once again delivered a balanced budget that focuses on meeting the needs of Edinburgh’s residents. It is a budget that reinforces our commitment to tackling poverty, prioritising prevention and protecting frontline services for those most in need of our support – all while keeping the increase in Council Tax to one of the lowest, if not the lowest, in the country.

“We were the first city in Scotland to declare a housing emergency and are now putting our money where our mouths are with an additional investment over the next five years – one of the largest housing interventions by a local authority in modern times. This will provide thousands of much-needed affordable new homes for families, while reducing the use of costly and unsuitable temporary accommodation and helping us to reduce the scourge of poverty on this city.

“Alongside the additional £6 million we’ve pledged towards social care, we’re prioritising support for some of our most vulnerable children and young people across the city. We’re investing in early family support, keeping children with their families wherever we can.

“We’re expanding support for pupils with additional support needs, with extra staff in both our special schools and mainstream schools. And we’re committing £86 million towards progressing major extensions at both Craigroyston and Queensferry High Schools.

“It’s important to remember that we’re not working in isolation and, having listened to our third sector partners, we’re today committing an additional £4 million to help them continue playing an essential role in supporting our residents – and, crucially, to plan with more certainty and security. This ambitious budget clearly demonstrates the strength of listening to our communities and working across party lines to do what’s best for the residents of Edinburgh.”

Finance and Resources Convener Mandy Watt added: “We remain the lowest funded council in Scotland, which poses a real challenge when setting our budget each year. Despite this, officers have produced an innovative budget that prioritises the services that most matter to the people of Edinburgh – from investing in our roads, pavements and parks to caring for our youngest, oldest and most vulnerable residents.

“This is a budget that protects, and in many cases enhances, these frontline services. But it also allows us to protect our residents and businesses from bearing too much of the financial burden that goes with it. I’m proud, then, that we’ve been able to limit our Council Tax rise to only 4% and to freeze most fees and charges for the next 12 months.”

SNP Group leader Simita Kumar tweeted: “A Tory–Lib Dem budget passed today with Labour’s backing—despite warnings from officers and the Accounts Commission.

“£700k in cuts agreed, with Labour using homelessness funds as leverage for Tory votes. Edinburgh deserves better than grubby deals made in the back room!”

EDINBURGH’s BUDGET – KEY FACTS

Tackling the housing emergency

  • Tackling the housing emergency with an additional £1.6bn investment for affordable homes and temporary accommodation – 2,500 homes for temporary accommodation, funding to unlock around 1,100 settled homes at affordable rents and investment capacity for up to around 2,300 additional settled homes.
  • Further key investments totalling £3m directed towards homelessness prevention, including additional staffing to work directly with those at risk of homelessness and creation of a grants budget to bring empty homes back into use as part of the Private Sector Leasing scheme.

Maintaining and improving the city’s roads, schools and public buildings

  • Continue ongoing investment in roads and pavements programme with a further £25m for two years, following the initial investment of £37.5m over three years, which brought a significant improvement in the state of city’s roads. An additional £480k was agreed today towards pothole repairs and white line painting.
  • Craigroyston and Queensferry High Schools will benefit from investment totalling £85.8m to progress major extensions as part of the City Plan 2030. This is in addition to the investment of £296m in five new schools and five extensions, together with the replacement of Fox Covert Campus, which was approved last year.
  • £13.2m for the development of a new permanent Blackhall Library, £7.5m for Portobello Swim Centre and an additional £18.3m over ten years to enhance a co-ordinated Council-wide Buildings Improvement Programme.

Getting it right for every child

  • Budgeted spend on Children, Education and Communities in 2026-27 of £587m, an increase of £14m compared to last year’s budget.
  • Continued investment in education and children’s services, including expanded ASN staffing and facilities, ensuring inclusive education and better life chances for every child in Edinburgh and support targeted investment to improve safety and address violence and aggression at work, recognising the duty of care owed to Council employees and the importance of safe service delivery.
  • Prioritising early family support and keeping children with their families where safe, rather than costly and disruptive external care placements.

Preventing poverty

  • Rolling out Neighbourhood Prevention Partnerships across five local areas to join up services and make help more accessible.
  • Funding for advice and benefits services (building on a £1m allocation in 2025/26).
  • Improving affordable childcare access, expanding affordable housing, and creating a citywide community wealth-building plan.
  • Prioritising the acceleration and improvement of the city-wide early intervention actions needed to prevent poverty in Edinburgh.

Supporting the third sector

  • A sustainable and strengthened package of support for the third sector, including a £1.4m income maximisation fund, providing support for third sector providers of money, welfare, and debt advice in Edinburgh and a £2.0m Local Community Organisations fund – with a further £500k agreed today to support small third sector organisations.

Extra support for health and social care

  • The budget includes an additional £6 million uplift to support the Integration Joint Board budget pressures. This approach provides short-term financial stability for the IJB, allowing focus to remain on service sustainability, transformation and delivery of strategic priorities.
  • Invest £50k towards installing Bleed Kits in Council buildings across the city

New Council Tax bands

A            1,084.03

B            1,264.71

C            1,445.38

D           1,626.05

E            2,136.45

F            2,642.33

G           3,184.35

H           3,983.82

COSLA speaks out against online abuse as councils set budgets

COSLA President, Councillor Shona Morrison, has released the following statement:

“COSLA is concerned to see increasing levels of toxic online behaviour and abuse directed towards Scotland’s elected members, particularly in the wake of Councils setting their budgets and council tax levels for the year.

“Councillors across Scotland are dedicated public servants carrying out their democratic duties on behalf of their communities. They deserve to do so free from intimidation, harassment, or personal attack.

“Budget decisions are taken locally, transparently, and with great care by councillors who have their communities’ best interests at heart and who work tirelessly to protect essential local services under financial constraint. 

“Public debate and scrutiny are vital components of our democracy but abuse, intimidation, and targeted harassment have no place in that discussion.

“COSLA urges all individuals and organisations to engage respectfully, and to recognise that councillors are making incredibly difficult decisions as they work to safeguard essential local services within a national funding landscape that remains extremely challenging. 

“In a world that feels increasingly fractured, building trust in our democracy is rooted in how we treat each other and to that end we welcome robust and open debate and discussion while remaining respectful.”

Edinburgh’s Budget Meeting will take place on Thursday (26 February).