Covid Inquiry: Care sector “something of an afterthought” with NO so-called ‘protective ring’

The Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Baroness (Heather) Hallett, has today published her sixth report. She concludes that, in the early stages of the pandemic, not enough was done to protect people in care settings and that the adult social care sector appeared to be “something of an afterthought”.

There were more than 43,000 recorded deaths involving Covid-19 in care homes between March 2020 and July 2022. A lack of proper planning, plus failures to implement lessons from earlier pandemic planning exercises, meant the UK government and devolved administrations took critical decisions in the early weeks without the information they needed. Action to protect carers and care users came too late, with devastating consequences.

Module 6, the sixth of the Inquiry’s 10 investigations, examined the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, including infection prevention, visiting restrictions, the experiences of the care workforce and decisions on discharge from hospitals.

The ‘Care Sector’ (Module 6) report concludes that while the UK government and devolved administrations knew, prior to the pandemic, of the extreme vulnerability of care home residents to respiratory viruses, care homes received insufficient protection at the time they most needed it.

The claim that “a protective ring” had been put in place around care homes “right from the start” of the Covid-19 outbreak was unfounded.

Not enough was done to protect people in care settings between March and mid-April 2020. The decision to speed up the discharge of patients from hospitals into care homes was necessary to free up hospital beds. But the decision to do so was taken in March 2020 when there was not enough testing capacity to know patients’ Covid-19 status.

At the time, isolating discharged patients inside care settings was one of the few effective protections available. Yet, in March 2020, England, Wales and Northern Ireland did not initially advise this, a failure the Inquiry calls “a significant omission”.

Today’s report shows how, as the deadly virus spread rapidly, care home residents were left feeling isolated, abandoned and alone as visiting restrictions cut them off from loved ones, in some cases for months.

Some people were not allowed to be with dying friends or relatives in their final moments, leaving bereaved people grief-stricken.

They could not help their loved ones with daily tasks such as eating, drinking and washing, support which can be vital for some residents. As a result, Baroness Hallett concludes: “Many remain wracked by a guilt that they do not deserve to carry.”

Visiting restrictions did not begin to ease until the summer of 2020. The report concludes that the severity and duration of these restrictions caused “profound and enduring effects” inside care homes, particularly for residents with complex cognitive conditions such as dementia.

Many millions of people across the UK receive adult social care. This includes older people, people with dementia and people living with physical and learning disabilities. For them and the people who dedicate themselves to providing their care, the pandemic totally disrupted their daily lives and had a devastating impact.

Baroness (Heather) Hallett, Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry said: “At the critical early stages of the pandemic, not enough was done to protect those living and working in care homes. The mantra at the time of ‘protecting the NHS’ sometimes came at the expense of the users and providers of care. The adult social care sector as a whole appeared to be something of an afterthought.

“The profound isolation and sense of abandonment felt by residents as a result of the visiting restrictions resulted in immense emotional harm. Most distressingly, some people were not permitted to be with their dying loved ones. Many remain wracked by a guilt that they do not deserve to carry.

“During the pandemic, the action taken by the UK government and devolved administrations to try and protect workers and users of adult social care came too late. The failures were the direct result of an absence of proper pandemic planning for the adult social care sector. It underlines why my recommendations in this report must be acted upon now before the next pandemic strikes.”

The Covid-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated the underlying fragility of the adult social care workforce. A workforce of at least 1.5 million people – including care in the home (domiciliary care) – provided care during the pandemic. Many put their own lives at risk.

Severe shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) meant that some care workers were left having to wear waterproof ponchos from festivals, painters’ overalls, or home-made PPE made from fabric, bin bags and bed linen.

The report describes this as “wholly unacceptable”, finding that care workers were left “without the protection they needed”. It concludes that while PPE shortages were a global problem, better planning could have ensured a much better supply from the outset.

Many care workers suffered burnout. Some left the profession entirely. Changes to sick pay were introduced in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland between March and May 2020, but not in Wales until November 2020.

The UK’s 5.8 million unpaid carers were also heavily relied upon, providing complex care for longer hours with little or no respite. The Inquiry concludes that support for unpaid carers came too late and that for too long the adult social care sector as a whole has been undervalued and under-recognised.

The Inquiry’s latest report also examines concerns about the use of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions, echoing concerns raised in its Module 3 report that some decisions were made inappropriately or without proper consultation, based on a person’s age, health condition or learning disability.

While finding no evidence of national policy encouraging blanket use of DNACPRs, the report recommends mandatory end-of-life care training for health and social care workers, who often lacked the skills to have these conversations thoughtfully and compassionately.

Ultimately, the report finds that these failures and others stemmed from an absence of proper pre-pandemic planning for the adult social care sector.

Exercise Cygnus, a pandemic preparedness exercise conducted in October 2016, recommended developing ways to assess social care and surge capacity, but this work had not been completed by the time the Covid-19 pandemic struck. As a result, ministers were left making decisions without the information they needed about the sector.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/xpqibzP6H5k?feature=oembed&enablejsapi=1&rel=0

The Chair makes eight key recommendations to ensure the adult social care sector is better protected and better equipped to respond to the next pandemic, including:

  • Improving arrangements for pandemic planning to ensure clearer structures, roles and responsibilities.
  • Better planning for the safe isolation of care home residents.
  • Implementing financial support schemes ready to be rolled out to support adult social care staff to self-isolate or to limit staff movement.
  • Publishing guidance on visiting restrictions.
  • Maintaining inspection and oversight by developing protocols to enable inspections to continue, including, where possible, on-site inspections.
  • Improving the collection of data about deaths in the adult social care sector.
  • Establishing mandatory end-of-life care training for relevant health and social care workers.
  • Introducing a voluntary register for the social care workforce in England, recognising and supporting a workforce that already benefits from such registers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

A four-page brief summary of the report can be found on the Inquiry’s website and is available in a variety of languages and accessible formats.

In total, 57 witnesses gave oral evidence during Module 6 public hearings, held between 30 June and 31 July 2025. The Inquiry heard from care home residents and their families, unpaid carers, care workers and sector representatives, as well as healthcare professionals, policy-makers, regulators and relevant experts, including serving and former senior politicians and civil servants.

The Inquiry has already published reports for Modules 1 to 5, all of which are available on the Inquiry’s website. Baroness Hallett notes the action taken to date by the four governments of the UK and expects that all recommendations from all published reports will be implemented promptly and in full.

This follows the formal government responses to Module 3 published earlier this month by the UK Government, Scotland and Wales. Progress on the implementation of recommendations can be tracked on the Monitoring of Inquiry Recommendations page on the Inquiry’s website.

The Inquiry’s seventh report, Module 7 ‘Test, Trace and Isolate’, will be published on Thursday 19 November 2026. The remaining three reports – Module 8 ‘Children and Young People’, Module 9 ‘Economic Response’ and Module 10 ‘Impact on Society’ – will be published in the first half of 2027. 

Read the full Module 6 report, the In Brief summary and other accessible formats on our website.


Latest Covid-19 Inquiry report to be published today

MODULE 6 FOCUSES ON THE CARE SECTOR

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry will publish its sixth report, ‘Care Sector’ (Module 6), today (Tuesday 20 October 2026).

The report will be published on the Inquiry website at 12pm. The Chair of the Inquiry, Baroness Heather Hallett, will present her findings and recommendations in video statements on the Inquiry’s YouTube channel immediately after publication.

Module 6 public hearings took place from 30 June to 31 July 2025.

In total, 57 witnesses gave oral evidence during Module 6 public hearings. Module 6 investigated the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The report will consider the consequences of government decision-making – including restrictions imposed – on those living and working within the care sector, as well as decisions concerning capacity in hospitals and residents in adult care and residential homes.

It will also address the steps taken in adult care and residential homes to prevent the spread of Covid-19 and will examine the capacity of the adult care sector to respond to the pandemic.

Alongside this, the report will consider the human impact of the pandemic on residents and their families, including deaths in care settings, the use of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions and the restrictions placed on visits from loved ones.

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry will publish its seventh report, ‘Test, Trace and Isolate’ (Module 7), on Thursday 19 November 2026.

Covid-19 Inquiry London, UK.

Secretary to the Inquiry, Ben Connah, said: “The Chair of the Inquiry, Baroness Heather Hallett, will set out her findings and recommendations in both reports. The publication of these reports marks swift progress for the Inquiry.

“All public hearings have concluded and seven of our planned 10 reports will be published by mid-November. All remaining reports will be published in the first half of next year. 

“The Chair expects all recommendations to be implemented without delay and governments across all four nations will be asked to publish their responses within six months of publication. 

“The swift implementation of the Chair’s recommendations is vital to make sure the UK is better prepared for the next pandemic.”

The great public services rip-off

Billions a year lost to private profit: STUC report into Scotland’s outsourcing crisis

Almost £3 billion of public money is “lining the pockets” of private profiteers within Scotland’s public services according to a shock new report from Scotland’s largest trade union body.

The Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) has issued a stark warning following the publication of new research by the Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE), estimating that outsourcing is draining £2 to 3 billion EVERY YEAR from Scotland’s public services through private profit and financial extraction.

The report shows that Scotland’s public money is being siphoned away from vital public services, including health, social care, education and local government and into the pockets of investors, global corporations and private equity funds.

Published by the APSE on behalf of the STUC, the report highlights the private-dominated care sector, where 79% of care home places are now in private hands and more than 20% of income leaks out of the system to corporate owners and investors.

Scotland spends more than £16 billion a year buying services, goods and works from external suppliers. The services that are most commonly outsourced, such as social care and soft facilities management, are overwhelmingly staffed by women. The report highlights that sacrificing the pay and pensions of thousands of low paid women is discriminatory, unfair and counterproductive.

STUC Leader Roz Foyer condemned the findings and called into question the aims of the Scottish Government’s own Public Service Reform Strategy, which stresses prevention, whole-system planning, fair work and community wealth building.

Roz Foyer, STUC General Secretary, said: “This report exposes the true cost of Scotland’s rip-off outsourcing crisis – a systematic extraction of public wealth on an industrial scale.

“Billions of pounds that should be paying for health, care staff, cleaners, refuse workers and local services are instead lining the pockets of shareholders and private equity interests with not a penny reinvested into our public services.

“We are urging the Scottish Government to act now. The bear minimum they need to do is ensure the same level of scrutiny is applied to the extent and quality of privately delivered public services as the Government applies to direct provision.

“However, you cannot build a Fair Work economy on the backs of the private profiteering of our public services.  Insourcing, directly awarding services and embracing trade unions as partners in that endeavour is not only fairer but also economically smarter. Every pound kept in public hands supports local jobs, local economies and better services.

“As we approach the election, Scotland cannot afford political silence from prospective MSPs who ignore the silent privatisation of Scotland’s public services.  Our public services are too important to be auctioned off to the lowest bidder and should not be handed to profiteers.”

Senior appointment announced at Cramond Residence

ONE of Scotland’s most premier luxury care homes has revealed it has secured the appointment of a new Head of Sales and Marketing, who is set to bring a wealth of experience to the home.

Richard Annan, 58, has joined Edinburgh-based care home Cramond Residence to help further elevate the homes prestigious status as one of Scotland’s finest residences.

Richard said: “Joining Cramond Residence is an exciting new challenge for me. The home has an outstanding reputation for the best care in class.

“I’m eager to continue to build on the homes success by further improving our resident’s experience during their time with us and I want to ensure that every resident feels at home here, with activities and services tailored to their individual needs.

“It’s vital that residents truly enjoy their time here and we provide their families with peace of mind that they are receiving the best care possible.

“Whether it’s dementia care or general residential living, we want to cater to everyone’s needs and ensure they have a fulfilling experience.

“We have outstanding facilities that cater to all our resident’s needs, from round the clock care to luxurious and spacious rooms as well as a wide range of activities on offer for residents to enjoy. Those who stay with us can expect nothing but the very best.”

With a marketing career spanning 30 years, Richard has since spent the last five years working for some of the UK’s largest care providers working in a number of homes across the country building an impressive track record.

Now, Richard’s key focus is enhancing the activities programme at Cramond Residence, ensuring that all residents—especially those living with dementia—enjoy meaningful and stimulating experiences.

Ross Bijak, General Manager for Cramond Residence said: “Richard’s passion for the care sector, combined with his impressive track record, makes him a perfect fit for Cramond Residence.

“We’re confident that with his arrival the home will continue to grow and provide the highest standards of care for all our residents.”

Cramond Residence combines luxury accommodation with the highest quality of care, offering a unique small-group living experience within its purpose-built, five-star facility.

With a resident-to-staff ratio designed to ensure personalized attention, the residence provides a range of specialised services, including dementia care, to meet the diverse needs of its residents.

The home also uniquely offers post-operative care rehabilitation, recently helping Cramond Residence Charge Nurse, Eileen Crawford, with her recovery after a hip replacement procedure.

Opened in October 2018 at a cost of £8 million, Cramond Residence continues to deliver outstanding clinical standards in a setting designed for comfort and community.

For more information about Cramond Residence, visit: 

https://cramondresidence.co.uk/

Tonight at 6.30: Public Meeting – Save Our Care Homes

Speakers include Graeme Smith (Unite), Alyson Pollock, Nick Kempe, a Unison rep and more.

We want to make the case for saving the homes as widely known as possible and argue that the future of residential care should be public, democratically accountable and provide security and comfort for all those who need it.

Register in advance for this meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/…/tZwodOGuqDIvE9bz…

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Letters: Caring for our older people

Dear Editor

The NHS, in all it’s forms, has been invaluable for people. This is understood: we would all be in deep trouble without it.

It is hard to believe organisations see the provision of health services as a means to make huge profits. One of the biggest dangers for the NHS is countries like the USA.

The importance of the people to own and control the NHS has been a tremendous lesson for all. It is now unthinkable to most that it should be otherwise.

This example of how to benefit society must now be extended to what is called the ‘care sector’. It, too, should be a publicly-owned extension of the NHS, not owned by private cmpanies or a business dependent on grants from local councils.

Every elderly person is exactly that, and must be treated with respect, not as an afterthought on some idea of ‘can we afford the cost?’ We can and must afford it!

The now elderly people need care and attention, love and respect for all they have done for us.

A. Delahoy

Silverknowes Gardens