Craigroyston students launch World War One project website

Craigroyston Community High School students have produced a website as part of a project on World War One. Continue reading Craigroyston students launch World War One project website

Scots want tougher controls on fireworks

Public concerns over animal welfare highlighted

A clear majority of Scots want to see tighter controls on the use and sale of fireworks.

A YouGov survey commissioned by the Scottish government and involving a representative sample of the Scottish population, showed 71% of adults supported tighter controls on the sale of fireworks to the public, with over half backing a ban.

And out of more than 16,000 respondents to a Scottish Government consultation on the issue:

94% want to see tighter controls on the sale of fireworks
93% want to see stronger regulations to ensure animals are not caused unnecessary suffering as a result of fireworks misuse
92% feel there should be tighter controls on fireworks use
87% would support an outright ban on the sale of fireworks

Concerns over the impact of fireworks on those with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and autism were also highlighted.

Community Safety Minister Ash Denham said: “The results of our consultation and survey demonstrate overwhelming public support for a change in how fireworks are sold and used.

“While legislation on the sale of fireworks is reserved to Westminster, I will work with stakeholders to look at the powers we have to drive forward action to reduce the damage caused by fireworks misuse.

“The consultation also highlighted the wider harm that can be caused to members of our communities, including our ex-service people and those with underlying mental health issues. The serious distress and occasional injury caused to animals around times of celebration has also been highlighted as a specific concern.

“I will update Parliament shortly on our intended action to ensure fireworks are used safely and appropriately.”

Scottish SPCA head of education and policy Gilly Mendes Ferreira said: “We’re pleased so many members of the public have voiced their opinion and cited animal welfare as one of the reasons to restrict the public sale and use of fireworks. For years we have supported tighter restrictions on public use due to the stress and anxiety that can be caused to animals.

“Over the years the Scottish SPCA has received a handful of calls relating to an animal that has been injured due to the direct misuse of fireworks. The majority of calls relate to animals that have become injured through trying to escape the noise of fireworks.

“Incidents include dogs running on to roads and being hit by oncoming traffic, birds, such as swans, flying into electricity pylons and horses being badly injured after running through barbed wire fences. We will continue to work closely with the Scottish Government to improve animal welfare surrounding the use of fireworks.”

The Scottish Government’s consultation on fireworks ran for 13 weeks and received 16,420 responses from members of the public and stakeholder organisations. The process included 29 public events around Scotland.

A consultation on fireworks in Scotland: your experiences, your ideas, your views. Analysis of responses to the public consultation exercise

Campaigners hail historic vote for equal protection for children

Scotland’s leading children’s charities and Scotland’s Children’s Commissioner have hailed yesterday’s historic Holyrood vote on equal protection as a UK first in legally protecting children from justifiable assault.

MSPs made history by voting in favour of Scotland becoming the first country in the UK to end the physical punishment of children. Green MSP John Finnie’s Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotland) Bill was voted through its third stage in parliament with 84 votes for and only 29 against.

In 2015, NSPCC Scotland, Barnardo’s Scotland, Children 1^st and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland commissioned research* which highlighted the negative impact of the physical punishment on children. Since the publication of the Equally Protected report, the four organisations have worked together with John Finnie MSP on his Member’s Bill to remove the ‘justifiable assault’ defence from Scots Law.

Joanna Barrett, policy and public affairs officer for NSPCC Scotland, said: “This historic vote delivers a UK first in fairness and equality for children which the NSPCC has long championed.

“It’s a common sense move that closes an archaic loophole and ensures that, finally, children in Scotland will have the same protection from assault as adults.

“The Scottish Parliament has listened to the evidence and acted in the best interests of our children, bringing our country into line with dozens of others that have all done the same thing.

“NSPCC Scotland thanks MSPs for listening and making a decision that ends the legally sanctioned physical punishment of our children.

“We will continue to work with the Scottish government as this change is implemented and the out-of-date defence of justifiable assault is, at long last, deleted from law.”

Director of Barnardo’s Scotland, Martin Crewe, said: “We are delighted that the Scottish Parliament has today passed the Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotland) Bill, this is a momentous day for children’s rights and we are extremely proud to have supported John Finnie and the Bill throughout this process.

“We know from our work across Scotland that children develop and thrive in safe, loving, nurturing environments. This Bill is first and foremost about ensuring our legal system fully protects children from all forms of violence, but it is also about helping to drive a positive culture change. We want to see a society where no violence against children is acceptable; a society where all children can expect to grow up feeling safe and loved.

“The Bill is not the end of this journey and we still have a way to go in ensuring that families receive appropriate help and support when they need it. We would like to see the passing of this Bill stimulate a renewed effort to look at what support is available for families who may be struggling.

“We extend our gratitude to John Finnie and his office for their dedication and passion for this issue and all their work to ensure the successful passage of the Bill – and we also commend Parliament for their commitment to upholding children’s rights. We look forward to seeing similar legislation passed in the Welsh Assembly and hope that this progress can be mirrored across the other nations of the UK too.”

Mary Glasgow, Chief Executive, Children 1st said: “This is a defining moment for Scotland. Again and again people have told us about the lifelong impact of being hit as a child, as they’ve joined the campaign to change the law.

“Today’s vote protects every future generation of Scotland’s children from any and all levels of physical violence. Families will be stronger and communities will be safer. Once again Scotland is leading the rest of the UK in doing what’s right for children – our most precious and vulnerable citizens.”

Bruce Adamson, Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland: “Assaulting a child for the purpose of punishment should never be legal and this important law change brings Scotland into line with its international human rights commitment to provide children with comprehensive legal protection from violence.

“The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child sets out that every child has the right to grow up in a family environment of happiness, love and understanding – violence should never be part of family life. Today the Scottish Parliament has played its crucial role as a human rights guarantor and I commend John Finnie on his strong human rights leadership on this issue.”

The decision has not been universally welcomed, however. Tory MSPs voted against the Bill, and outside the Holyrood parliament members of the Be Reasonable campaign distributed leaflets.

Both believe the legislation could lead to ordinary, decent parents being criminalised.

Jamie Gillies, from Be Reasonable, said: “Seeking to further the protection of children is highly commendable, but a smacking ban is not the way to do it.

“The risks this proposal carries to family life, social work and the police mean it could end up doing far more harm than good.

“The Government should invest in current services, which are already hard-pressed, and bolster their ability to identify and tackle abuse.”