‘CATASTROPHIC’: Spring Statement welfare cuts will drive 250,000 more people into poverty

Chancellor ‘delivers security and national renewal in a new era of global change’

  • Chancellor vows to bring about “new era of security and national renewal” as she delivered a Spring Statement to kickstart economic growth, protect working people and keep Britain safe.
  • People to be on average £500 a year better off by the end of this parliament compared to under the previous government, putting more money in people’s pockets.
  • OBR forecast concludes government’s landmark planning reforms will result in a £6.8 billion boost to the economy and housebuilding at its highest level in over 40 years by 2029-30
  • Growth at the heart of Plan for Change as £13 billion of additional capital spend allocated alongside £2.2 billion defence funding boost next year.

THE Labour government said people will be on average £500 better off from 2029, relative to OBR’s autumn forecast, helping to deliver the Plan for Change as the Chancellor yesterday (Wednesday 26 March) announced a Spring Statement to grasp the opportunities in a changing world.

THEY WON’T. From November 2026, 370,000 people who already get PIP will lose it and another 430, 000 who would qualify now no longer will. These people will lose £4500 a year each. And 150,000 carers who look after them will no longer receive their £83.30 a week Carer’s Allowance.

The OBR has also concluded that the government’s landmark planning reforms will result in UK housebuilding reaching its highest level in over 40 years, bringing the UK one step closer to its Plan for Change mission to build 1.5 million homes.

The government says economy will be 0.2% larger in 2029-30 because of the reforms – worth around £6.8 billion in today’s money – growing to 0.4% over the next ten years. This represents the biggest positive growth effect it has ever forecasted for a policy that comes at zero-cost to taxpayers. The reforms will secure over 170,000 new homes for hard working families and leave borrowing £3.4 billion lower in 2029-30.

The Chancellor also set out how the government is protecting national security and maximising the growth potential of the UK defence sector by confirming a £2.2 billion increase in the defence budget in 2025-26 while ensuring UK defence is on the cutting-edge of technology and innovation.

But growth is still not where it should be, so at this Spring Statement, this government has gone ‘further and faster’ to kickstart growth by training up to 60,000 young people to get Britain building again; increasing capital investment by £13 billion over this parliament; and fixing public services by tearing out waste from its roots.

Growth

Kickstarting economic growth is the number one mission of this government, putting more money in people’s pockets. The government has already made considerable progress; supporting a third runway at Heathrow; revitalising the Oxford Cambridge Growth Corridor, launching the National Wealth Fund and making the right choices on public investment to drive growth across the UK.

The actions of this government across the Autumn Budget and Spring Statement, if sustained, lead to a 0.6% rise in the level of real GDP by 2034-35, signalling the government’s growth plan is working.

The OBR concluded that the stability rule is met by £9.9 billion and the investment rule is met by £15.1 billion. Both rules are met two years early, meaning from 2027-28 the government is only borrowing for investment and net financial debt is falling.

The government is not satisfied with short-term growth figures, and is going further and faster today to improve this:

  • To go further and faster to get Britain building, the Chancellor has today announced a further £13 billion of capital investment over the Parliament to go further on growth, on top of the £100 billion uplift announced at Autumn Budget. This will deliver the projects needed to catalyse private investment, boost growth and drive forward the UK’s modern industrial strategy – unlocking the potential of the Oxford Cambridge Growth Corridor which could add up to £78 billion to the UK economy by 2035.
  • Taken together, this greater capital investment more than offsets the modest savings on day to day spending and means the total departmental spending will increase over the next five years, when compared with plans in the Autumn.
  • Over this Parliament, the government is funding a £625 million package to boost skills in the construction sector, which is expected to provide up to 60,000 more skilled construction workers to support the government’s plans to deliver 1.5 million homes in England over the parliament and progress vital infrastructure projects.
  • As part of this, the government is providing further support to scale up existing construction skills pathway over this Parliament through £100 million for 35,000 additional training places in construction-focused Skills Bootcamps, supporting trainees, ‘returners’, and existing employees to succeed in the sector. Building on the £40 million investment in the new Growth and Skills Levy at Autumn Budget 2024, the government is also providing a further £40 million to support up to 10,000 more young people to access new construction Foundation Apprenticeships, which will provide a key entry route into a thriving industry.
  • The government is ensuring there are enough skilled construction workers in the system, with £100 million to deliver 10 Technical Excellence Colleges specialised in construction across every region in England, and £165 million to increase funding for training providers delivering construction courses for 16-19-year-olds and adults.
  • The government is committed to supporting employers to unlock further investment in training to deliver more skilled construction workers, and is providing £100 million, alongside a £32 million contribution from the Construction Industry Training Board to deliver up to 40,000 industry placements in construction each year.
  • Supported by the construction skills package, the government confirmed this week that there will be a £2 billion injection of new grant funding to deliver up to 18,000 new social and affordable homes. The new funding will only support developments on sites that will deliver in this Parliament, getting spades in the ground quickly to build homes in places such as Manchester and Liverpool.

Defence

The world is changing before our eyes, reshaped by global instability, including Russian aggression in Ukraine. Europe is facing a once-in-a-generation moment for its collective security, with conflicts overseas undermining security and prosperity at home.

A month ago, the PM announced the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War as a result of the changing global picture, now reaching 2.5% of GDP by April 2027, and with an ambition to reach 3% in the next Parliament subject to economic and fiscal conditions.

We are going further and faster to protect our national security and maximise the economic growth potential of the UK defence sector:

  • Increasing the defence budget by £2.2 billion in 2025-26, taking additional spending on defence to over £5 billion since the Autumn Budget.
  • This raises spending on defence to 2.36% next year and will be invested in fitting Royal Navy ships with Directed Energy Weapons five years earlier than planned, providing better homes for military families and modernising His Majesty’s Naval Base Portsmouth.
  • Setting a minimum 10 percent ringfence for equipment spending on emerging technologies like drones and autonomous systems, dual-use technology, and AI-powered capabilities, so that British troops have the tools they need to fight and win in modern warfare.
  • Getting this new tech into the hands of our armed forces quicker by cutting away bureaucracy, with a new UK Defence Innovation unit within the Ministry of Defence spearheading efforts to identify promising technology and ensure these get to the frontline at speed, while also bolstering the UK tech sector and crowding in private investment.
  • Creating bespoke procurement processes for different types of military equipment, learning lessons from our rapid support for Ukraine to drive faster timescale targets for operationalising new tanks, aircraft and other essential tools for modern warfare.
  • This government is determined to transform the defence sector into an engine for growth by focusing this investment on where it boosts the productive capacity of the economy such as investment in innovation and novel technologies. As a result of the increase in defence spending to 2.5%, the government estimates this could lead to around 0.3% higher GDP in the long run, equivalent to around £11 billion of GDP in today’s money.
  • The government’s investment in defence will also support its number one mission to deliver economic growth. UK citizens will be protected from threats at home whilst creating a stable environment in which businesses can thrive, and supporting highly skilled jobs and apprenticeships across the whole of the UK.

Reform

The government is determined to make the public sector more productive and to improve services for working people. But the changing world means we need to go further and faster to ensure we can deliver the public services that working people care most about.

The government has shown its commitment to taking the difficult decisions required to drive efficiencies and reform the state – including announcing that the world’s largest quango, NHS England, will be brought back into the Department for Health and Social Care, reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies and duplication; and driving out wasteful government spend through cancelling thousands of government credit cards.

Getting more people into jobs is also central to the government’s growth mission. This broken welfare system that is letting people down by asking them to prove what they can’t do, rather than focusing on what they could do with the right support – trapping people due to fear of trying work, lack of support and poor financial incentives.

The social security system will always protect those who can never work, that is why this government is proposing an additional premium that will safeguard their incomes. And will end reassessments for people with the most severe, life-long conditions to give them dignity and security.

Helping more people into work is a central aim of these reforms and which is why the government is tackling incentives to be inactive by abolishing the WCA, rebalancing Universal Credit, and investing more into employment support.

We will always support those with long term health conditions through the Personal Independence Payment, which will remain an important non-means tested benefit for disabled people and people with long term health conditions. But these reforms will make the system more targeted and sustainable to ensure the safety net is there for those who need it most.

The OBR have now set out their final assessment of costings and confirmed this welfare package will reduce welfare spending by £4.8 billion in 2029-/30.

The government will modernise the Civil Service into a more productive and agile organisation that can effectively deliver the Plan for Change, underpinned by a digital revolution, while cancelling thousands of government procurement cards.

Today, the Chancellor has gone further:

  • The Chancellor has confirmed the creation of a £3.25 billion Transformation Fund to support the fundamental reform of public services, seize the opportunities of digital technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and transform frontline delivery to release savings for taxpayers over the long-term.
  • The Fund will invest in vital public services and accelerate the modernisation of the state by taking the next step to reform the children’s social care system through an additional £25 million for the fostering system. This will include funding the recruitment of a further 400 new fostering households, providing children with stability and addressing cost pressures on local government.
  • The fund will also support the managing offenders in the community, by providing £8 million for new technology so probation officers can focus on reducing reoffending, rather than filling out forms.
  • In addition, it will provide £42 million for three pioneering DSIT-led Frontier AI Exemplars. These Exemplars will test and deploy AI applications to make government operations more efficient and effective and improve outcomes for citizens by reducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
  • To create an agile and productive state we are also providing £150 million for government employee exit schemes. This will support a leaner and more efficient Civil Service, helping to reduce administration costs by 15% by the end of the decade.
    The Chancellor also announced a package of measures to close the tax gap, raising £1 billion per year by 2029-30. The UK tax gap was estimated to be around £40 billion in 2022-23.
  • The Spring Statement earmarks around £80 million in new money for third party debt collectors to bring in £1.3 billion over the next five years – a return of around £16 for every pound spent for UK public services and investment projects. HMRC will also receive £4 million in new funding to pilot a new test and learn programme with the private sector to improve the tax collection agency’s approach to recouping older unpaid tax debt. Ministers will decide whether to proceed with a larger exercise later this year based on the results of this test.
  • An additional 600 staff will also be recruited into HMRC’s debt management teams. This means that for every £1 spent on these staff, over £13 of debt is expected to be recovered. The staff will work with the private sector to make collecting tax debt more efficient including through automating admin processes.
  • The Spring Statement also announces £100 million in new funding for HMRC to recruit a further 500 compliance officers from April 2025. This will raise £241 million in unpaid tax over the next five years.
  • Late payment penalties for VAT and Making Tax Digital for income tax Self Assessment will increase to incentivise taxpayers to pay on time. This will be from 2% to 3% at 15 days, 2% to 3% at 30 days, and 4% to 10% from day 31. This will take effect from April 2025.
  • As announced in the autumn, Making Tax Digital for income tax Self Assessment will be extended to sole traders and landlords with income over £20,000. The Spring Statement confirms that this additional group will join Making Tax Digital from April 2028. This will build on the existing plan which will see sole traders and landlords with income above £50,000 joining from April 2026, and those with income above £30,000 joining from April 2027. Around 4 million businesses have an income below the £20,000 threshold.

Looking Forward

This Spring Statement builds on the Autumn Budget and the decisions taken since required to deliver stability to the British economy and kickstart economic growth.

The government will set out its plans for spending and key public sector reforms at the Spending Review which will conclude on 11 June 2025.

This will not be a business-as-usual Spending Review. The government has fundamentally reformed the process to make it zero-based, collaborative, and data-led, in order to ensure a laser-like focus on the biggest opportunities to rewire the state and deliver the Plan for Change.

At the Spending Review, the Budget in the autumn and across the Parliament, the government will continue to prioritise growing the economy to deliver change.

RESPONSES:

UK spending cuts ‘risk harm to most vulnerable’

Finance Secretary responds to Spring Statement

Spending cuts announced by the Chancellor risk harming some of the most vulnerable people in society, Finance Secretary Shona Robison has said.

Responding to the Spring Statement, Ms Robison said: “Today’s statement from the Chancellor will see austerity cuts being imposed on some of the most vulnerable people in our society. The UK Government appears to be trying to balance its books on the backs of disabled people.

“Not content with these cuts, the UK Government is still expected to short-change Scotland’s public services on additional employer National Insurance costs to the tune of hundreds of millions of pounds. This will be felt in public services that people rely on up and down the country – services such as our NHS, GPs, dentists, social care providers, and universities.

“The UK Government’s choice to increase defence investment is welcome, but its choices to shortchange public services and deliver austerity cuts to some of the most vulnerable are deplorable.”

TRUSSELL:

Trussell responds to ‘catastrophic’ Spring Statement

Cara Hilton, Senior Policy Manager at Trussell in Scotland, said: “Today’s announcement has incredibly worrying implications for disabled people in Scotland.

“The insistence by the Treasury on driving through record cuts to disabled people’s social security to balance the books is both shocking and appalling. People at food banks are telling us they are terrified how they’ll survive.

“These brutal cuts to already precarious incomes won’t help more disabled people find work, but they will risk forcing more people to skip meals and turn to food banks to get by.

“Cuts come at a cost. Driving up hunger and hardship means more spending on already struggling public services, with increased hospital and GP visits a very likely outcome of these actions.

“Disabled people are already three times more likely to face hunger, and over three quarters of people in receipt of Universal Credit and disability benefits are already struggling to afford the essentials like food. This will only get worse.

“These cruel cuts are out of touch with what voters want from this government. The government says people voted for change in Westminster, but we know that seven in ten voters across political parties agree the social security for disabled people should at least be enough to cover essential living costs. This is a change for the worse, and it is disabled people who will pay the price.”

David, 46, has a bone disease and is terrified by the prospect of cuts to his disability benefits. He has recently been forced to turn to a Trussell food bank for support.

He said: “I am terrified now that the Chancellor has confirmed that my disability benefits will be cut. The bone tumours in my hips cause me pain everyday and force me to use crutches, and in the cold weather my symptoms worsen but I already can’t afford to put the heating on.

” I don’t know how I’ll survive. It’s not my fault I’m disabled, and I shouldn’t be punished for it.

“Life costs more if you’re disabled. Things like specialist equipment and travel to healthcare appointments all add up. PIP – which the government is brutally cutting – is there to account for these extra costs. It is not a luxury, and I shouldn’t need to use a food bank or turn to charities like Trussell for support.

“Cutting my benefits won’t get me back to work – it will just push me deeper into poverty.”

JOSEPH ROWNTREE FOUNDATION

The Chancellor said today that she would not do anything to put household finances in danger Yet the government’s own assessment shows their cuts to health related benefits risk pushing 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children.

“Their assessment also found:

  • 800,000 will lose PIP according to the OBR
  • 3m will lose money from changes to the main health element of UC, £500 a year for existing claimants, and £3000 for new claimants
  • £500m will come out of the carers benefits bill as 150,000 lose carers allowance or UC care element.

“The Chancellor said the world has changed, and today’s announcements places the burden of that changing world on the shoulders of those least able to bear the load. These cuts will harm people, deepening the hardship they already face.”

CHILD POVERTY ACTION GROUP:

Responding to today’s Spring Statement, chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group Alison Garnham said: “Stealth social security cuts bring neither stability nor security to struggling families and will push child poverty even higher.

“Growth and better living standards are not achieved by taking money from families with the least.

“Government must invest in social security support – not cut it – for the most vulnerable, or risk being remembered as the Labour administration under whose watch child poverty continued to rise.”

CARERS UK:

STUC:

INDEPENDENT ALLIANCE MPs:

KIM JOHNSON MP:

OCTOPUS ENERGY:

Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus Energy, said:  “It’s good to see the focus on planning and other reforms that can unlock investment to help make Britain more productive and drive growth.

“We were also pleased to see the receipts from the Government’s sale of Bulb to Octopus funding 36,000 homes for armed forces families. It’s a sign of how business and Government can work together for the good of the country.”

FRONT PAGES:

MOMENTUM:

NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION:

JEREMY CORBYN:

PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER:

THE NATIONAL:

TRADES UNION CONGRESS (TUC):

Responding to today’s (Wednesday) Spring Statement, TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: “Labour inherited a toxic economic legacy from the Conservatives. But at the Budget the Chancellor took the right call to invest in repairing our public services and infrastructure. 

“To rebuild Britain this approach must continue long-term. In the face of strong global headwinds, we need to keep building stronger foundations at home. That must include protecting the most vulnerable. 

“As the last 14 years have shown us – you cannot cut your way to growth. UK taxes are low as a share of GDP. Those with the broadest shoulders must continue to contribute more through a fairer tax system.

“And the Tories’ botched Brexit deal must be improved to boost growth and trade.”

On the government’s social security reforms, Paul said: “Ministers need to rethink their plans. Decisions that affect millions of people’s lives must be made with care – not as a last-minute response to changed fiscal forecasts. 

“These changes mean many disabled people – whether they are in work or not – will be pushed into hardship. 

“And removing support could even make it harder for some people to stay in their jobs.

“Disabled people need timely access to high quality healthcare, and accessible jobs – particularly in the towns and communities where there are fewest opportunities.”

On the public sector workforce, Paul added: “Public sector workers are key deliverers of national renewal. 

“But after 14 years of Tory chaos and ruin, many feel burnt out and demoralised.

“It’s vital the government invests in these workers and recognises the key role they play in improving the services we all rely on.

“Any approach to transforming our public services must include clear workforce plans for every part of our public sector, developed in partnership with staff and unions.”

On the OBR’s growth forecasts, Paul said: “It is time to review both the role of the OBR and how it models the long-term impacts of public investment. Short-term changes in forecasts should not be driving long-term government decision-making.”

UNITE THE UNION:

UK FINANCE:

David Postings, Chief Executive Officer, UK Finance said: “The chancellor’s Spring Statement focused on stability and growth in the UK. We welcome the government’s continued commitment to growing the economy and the financial services sector is committed to playing its part in support.

“Building on recent positive regulatory reform plans, we now look forward to the upcoming Industrial Strategy, which will be key to unlocking further investment and delivering growth through various sectors, including financial services.”

MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION:

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP:

Charlie Nunn, Chief Executive Officer, Lloyds Banking Group said: “A safe and lasting home is the foundation for good lives and livelihoods, and we welcome this boost to building much-needed social and affordable homes.

“As the UK’s biggest commercial supporter of social housing, we’re working across the private, public and community sectors to help increase provision of good quality, genuinely affordable housing for those in need.”

UNITE HOSPITALITY:

DAILY MIRROR:

POVERTY ALLIANCE:

Responding to the Spring Statement, Poverty Alliance chief executive Peter Kelly said: “People in the UK voted for change at the last election because they were desperate for a government that delivers a just and compassionate country. Today’s announcements undermine that ambition.

“It is completely unjust to, once again, balance the books on the backs of the those on the lowest incomes. Today’s statement layered additional cuts to our social security system on top of those announced last week. That will have a devastating impact for households across the country.

“The Government’s own analysis shows that these changes will push at least 250,000 people, including 50,000 children into poverty, undermining the forthcoming child poverty strategy before it’s even published.

“These cuts will push people into debt and destitution. They will continue the need for food banks. They will stop people heating their homes, or charging essential medical and support equipment.

“People know that there is no justification for these cuts. It does not have to be like this. The Chancellor could scrap her self-imposed fiscal rules or use our taxation system to raise the revenue needed for the better future we all want to see.

“The UK Government is re-running a failed experiment – austerity will not deliver economic growth. And it certainly won’t deliver a just and compassionate society.”

SCOTTISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION:

Deep concern about impact of UK Government’s Spring Statement

The Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC) is deeply concerned about the impact of announcements on the future of the UK welfare system in the UK Government’s Spring Statement, especially for disabled people and their families and communities. 

Plans to cut the health element of Universal Credit will have a direct effect on the human rights of those disabled people in Scotland who are unable to work. Although payments to support people with the additional costs of disability are devolved in Scotland, the UK Government’s proposals will have negative consequences for the Scottish Budget.

Severe economic hardship

Earlier this month, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which holds governments around the world to account for their record on human rights, warned that changes to the UK welfare system introduced since 2012 have “eroded the rights to social security and to an adequate standard of living, disproportionally affecting persons with disabilities, low-income families and workers in precarious employment” and warned that these changes have resulted in “severe economic hardship”.

Last year, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities reiterated its position that the UK welfare system is leading to ‘grave and systematic’ violations of disabled people’s rights. Over the past week many disabled people, Disabled People’s Organisations and civil society organisations have expressed shock and fear about what further changes to the system could mean for people.

Professor Angela O’Hagan, Chair of the SHRC, says: “With these announcements, the UK Government is not only disregarding the expert findings and recommendations of human rights bodies, but actively pursuing regressive changes that further deteriorate the rights of disabled people in Scotland. 

“Indeed, these steps may potentially represent a breach of the UK’s obligations under international human rights law, particularly its duty to progressively realise the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, and non-discrimination.

“Social security, an adequate standard of living, and non-discrimination are not optional benefits — they are binding human rights that the UK is required to respect, protect, and fulfil for everyone.

“These proposals fly in the face of both the letter and the spirit of the UK’s human rights obligations.”

VOLUNTEER SCOTLAND:

We share the concerns voiced by many third sector organisations regarding the Chancellor’s Spring Statement on Wednesday (writes Volunteer Sotland’s SARAH LATTO).

The significant cuts to health-related benefits have the potential to push more people into financial difficulty. This would create significant additional demand for third sector services and the volunteers that support them.

This comes at a time when the third sector is facing unprecedented pressures, and volunteer participation is in significant decline. Given the reported challenges many organisations are experiencing in recruiting new volunteers, this could add considerable pressure to existing volunteers who give their time to support people in crisis. This is not sustainable and could contribute to a further decline in volunteer participation.

Last week we published research showing that weekly participation in formal volunteering can lead to wellbeing benefits worth an estimated £1000 per person per year. 

This same research also found that the effect of volunteering on mental wellbeing for people with a disability or long-term health condition was seven times larger than for people without.

Despite these clear benefits, we are concerned that the announced reduction in welfare spend will prevent many people in receipt of benefits from pursuing volunteering.

Our ongoing research regarding the impact of the cost of living crisis on volunteering suggests that the capacity of many people to volunteer is increasingly diminished.

This is because of competing demands on their time and rising stress or anxiety regarding their finances. The planned changes to welfare spend will likely exacerbate this situation further, meaning many people in receipt of health-related benefits may feel unable to participate in an activity that is likely to improve their health and wellbeing.

As a result, we join many voices from the third sector in urging the Chancellor to rethink her plans around welfare spend.

FRASER OF ALLANDER INSTITUTE:

Spring Statement reaction: a second fiscal event of the year after all

The Chancellor may have tried to portray it otherwise, but her words in the Commons and the length of the scorecard of measures published by the OBR betray a different story: this really was a fiscal event, and a significant one at that.

It was also one where the forecasting process was nowhere as smooth as we hoped it might be given how much hay the Chancellor made out of strengthening the role of the OBR in the Autumn. Instead, we have seen a number of measures either uncertified or included only on a provisional basis, and with no time to evaluate their supply-side effects.

Given how long these measures have been speculated about, the last-minute tweaks and the scramble to announce further welfare reforms to make the sums add up to the £5bn in savings are pretty disheartening. It also makes us wonder about the reasons for announcing the headline amounts last week, before ultimate certification by the OBR.

It is not credible that the Chancellor or the Work and Pensions Secretary were not aware of the OBR’s concerns at the time of the announcement, and so we are left to wonder why figures that weren’t final were bandied about beforehand instead of being left for the appropriate fiscal event.

The underlying picture deteriorated significantly, and so spending cuts have filled the gap

As widely predicted, the Chancellor would have seen her fiscal rules broken had she not made significantly policy decisions, which collectively cut current spending by nearly £9 billion a year by 2029-30.

Chart: How the Chancellor restored her headroom

Source: OBR

Debt servicing costs are the main reason for the deterioration. Higher market interest rates raised the cost of servicing government by just over £10 billion by the end of the decade, more than wiping the starting headroom. Faced with this, and after staking her credibility on complying with the fiscal rules, the Chancellor decided to mostly lean on the spending side of the ledger to essentially get back to where she started.

This means a heavily backloaded set of policy decisions, with spending cuts coming from 2027-28 onwards. Changes to incapacity and disability benefits mostly affect spending from then on, by £1.8 billion in that year and rising to £4.6 billion by 2029-30.

Changes to the path of day-to-day departmental spending also rise to over £5 billion by 2029-30, although some of that is offset by specific investment programmes such as employment support, DWP delivery and HMRC compliance. On net, current departmental spending has been cut by £3.6 billion by 2029-30 relative to plans.

There have also been some increasing in the tax take. Much of it is from compliance activity and tax debt collection, although there are also additional council tax increases allowed in England and increases to passport and visa fees. Receipts are higher by £2.3 billion by 2029-30 because of measures.

But the Chancellor has had to run just to stand still. She is just as close to missing her fiscal rule as she was in October, and that leaves her exposed to any weaknesses or market movements between now and the Autumn. Things may well turn out for the better – but that is far from guaranteed, and it’s as close to a 50-50 bet as it gets.

Chart: Headroom against the main fiscal target since 2010

Source: OBR

What do the announcements mean for the Scottish Budget?

In the very short-term, there is a small amount of additional funding (£28 million) for the Scottish Government in 2025-26 due to a small increase in departmental spending at UK Government level.

Towards the end of the forecast, however, the picture is significantly more challenging in terms of what it means for Holyrood’s finances. The cuts in departmental budgets announced by the UK Government – even after accounting for some consequentials from employment support programmes and DWP delivery of welfare reforms – mean significant reductions in funding for the Scottish Government relative to what was previously included in the forecasts. Of particular significance are the £200 million and £435 million cuts in implied funding for the Scottish Budget in 2028-29 and 2029-30.

The current forecast points to the PIP reforms reducing the block grant adjustment for social security devolution by increasing amounts, from £177 million in 2027-28 to £455 million in 2029-30. This is in line with what we discussed in recent blogs.

Put together, and in the absence of any other changes, the Scottish Budget would be around £900 million worse off on the current side in 2029-30 than previously projected. On the other hand, some additional capital spending on areas which are devolved in Scotland – so aside from the defence spending increases – are expected to raise the Scottish Government’s capital budget by nearly £250 million by 2029-30 relative to current plans.

Chart: Effects of the Spring Statement measures on the Scottish Budget

Source: OBR

There’s still much we don’t know about the welfare reforms

One key policy change from last week’s Green Paper that the OBR have not been able to cost is the removal of the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) that currently determines whether a person is eligible for the Universal Credit (UC) health element. The UK Government have proposed that the PIP assessment will be used instead.

The OBR note the absence of key policy detail, including how entitlement will operate in Scotland where PIP is being phased out. They do state that they expect the policy to have a “material” fiscal impact, both on spending on UC but this could be offset by an increase in people claiming PIP. The labour market response of this (as with most of the other Green Paper policies) is also yet to be analysed by the OBR.

These changes will directly impact on people in Scotland as UC is a reserved policy, but as already noted, how this will happen given that PIP will soon not exist in Scotland, is unknown. The number of people impacted could be significant. The Scottish Government could mitigate this impact through its own social security top up powers but, as with the recently announced mitigation of the two-child limit in UC, would need to be able to find the money to do so from within its own budget.

But distributional analysis shows significant numbers of people will be worse off

Alongside the Spring Statement documents, the UK Government also update their distributional analysis (the differential impact of policies on poorer, middle, and higher income households). The impact of the Spring Statement, the policies from the Spring Statement are added to the policies from the Autumn Statement, making it difficult to isolate the impact of the Spring Statement, although the regressive nature of the welfare measures is clear to see: those in the lower half of the income distribution are facing most of the cuts.

Separately, the UK Government has produced a statement on the impact of the health and disability reforms.

This makes for sobering reading. The impact of changes to the eligibility for PIP will affect 800,000 people who will no longer be eligible for the Daily Living component. They note a further 150,000 people will not receive Carer’s Allowance of the UC Carer element as a result. These numbers are for England and Wales only given that disability benefits are devolved.

These results, on their own, will increase the number of working age people in poverty by 250,000 and 50,000 children. The UK Government are careful to say that these estimates do not account for any employment impact of those who lose benefits subsequently moving into work, and we will need to wait for the OBR to judge on the strength of these employment effects to understand the potential for offsetting of these numbers.

The reduction and or freezing of the UC health element will affect Scottish claimants as well as those in England and Wales. 2.25 million people who are current claimants will be affected by the freeze and 730,000 new claimants will receive the new lower rate and freeze. A further 50,000 working age people will be in poverty as a result of these changes.

There is as yet no analysis of the impact of the abolition of the Work Capability Assessment in UC, and the only impact that is shown is the reversal of a 2023 change to the descriptors in the Work Capability Assessment, which will not apply given the decision to abolish it.

We’ll have to wait until the OBR has been able to look at the whole policy package in aggregate before we understand the full scale of the impact both on the UK and Scotland. But it is clear from what we know so far that this is a package of measures that will raise poverty across the UK.

How does departmental spending look in historical context?

In October, the Chancellor announced significant increases in departmental spending. But we and others also noticed how frontloaded some of those announcements were.

This has been made even more so by the changes at this forecast to the latter years of the projections. Day-to-day departmental spending per person is now forecast to grow by a strong 3.4% in real terms in 2025-26, slowing to 1.5% in 2026-27 and remaining at 0.6% a year for the rest of the decade.

We’ll leave others to decide on words to characterise this path of spending. We’ll instead note that this leaves spending per person only 8% higher than it was in 2007-08. And as a share of national income – a better measure of affordability and of the Government’s prioritisation of the country’s resources – there is a slight increase in spending in the short-term. But day-to-day departmental spending then falls back by 0.4 percentage points by the end of the decade relative to its peak of 16.1 per cent of GDP in 2025-26 and 2026-27.

Chart: Resource departmental spending per person in real terms and as a share of GDP since 2007-08

Source: OBR, FAI analysis

Mixed response as 2024-25 Scottish Budget unveiled

‘Targeted funding for people and public services’

A £6.3 billion investment in social security and more than £19.5 billion for health and social care form the heart of the Scottish Budget for next year, alongside record funding for local authorities and frontline police and fire services.

With targeted funding to invest in public services and protect the most vulnerable, the Budget underpins the social contract with the people of Scotland, Deputy First Minister and Finance Secretary Shona Robison told Parliament. She also outlined policies to grow the economy and progress the commitment to deliver a just transition to net zero.

Difficult decisions have been required to prioritise funding for the services people rely on in the face of a deeply challenging financial situation, Ms Robison added.

The 2024-25 Scottish Budget includes:

  • £6.3 billion for social security benefits, which will all be increased in line with inflation. This is £1.1 billion more than the funding received from the UK Government for devolved benefits in 2024-25
  • £13.2 billion for frontline NHS boards, with additional investment of more than half a billion – an uplift of over 4%
  • record funding of more than £14 billion for local government, including £144 million to enable local authorities to freeze Council Tax rates at their current levels
  • more than £1.5 billion for policing to support frontline services and key priorities such as body-worn cameras
  • almost £400 million to support the fire service
  • £200 million to help tackle the poverty-related attainment gap, almost £390 million to protect teacher numbers and fund the teacher pay deal, and up to £1.5 million to cancel school meal debt
  • almost £2.5 billion for public transport to provide viable alternatives to car use, and increased investment of £220 million in active travel to promote walking, wheeling and cycling

The Finance Secretary said: “It is an enormous privilege to present my first Budget. A Budget setting out, in tough times, to protect people, sustain public services, support a growing, sustainable economy, and address the climate and nature emergencies.

“At its heart is our social contract with the people of Scotland, where those with the broadest shoulders are asked to contribute a little more. Where everyone can have access to universal services and entitlements, and those in need of an extra helping hand will receive targeted additional support.

“This Budget is set in turbulent circumstances. At the global level the impacts of inflation, the war in Ukraine, and the after-effects of the pandemic continue to create instability. In the UK the combined effects of Brexit and disastrous Westminster policies mean that we are uniquely vulnerable to these international shocks.

“We cannot mitigate every cut made by the UK Government. But through the choices we have made, we have been true to our values and rigorous in prioritising our investment where it will have the most impact.

“We choose investment in our people and public services. This is a Budget that reflects our shared values as a nation and speaks to the kind of Scotland that we want to be.”

RESPONSES:

Responding to the Scottish Budget, STUC General Secretary Roz Foyer said: “With Westminster induced pressure on public spending in Scotland, we’re pleased that the Scottish Government has listened to the STUC and introduced a higher rate of tax for those on higher incomes.

“This represents a markedly positive approach which should be recognised. Equally, taking a more proportionate approach to rebates for business speaks to a Government which recognises the importance of the public sector to growing the economy.

“However, the Scottish Government’s Council Tax freeze and its unwillingness to countenance more ambitious tax reform has left a hole it was never going to be able to fill. High-quality, fully funded public services must be at the heart of a well-being economy and we cannot countenance any cuts – spun and packaged up as ‘reforms’ – which act as a barrier to that goal. Government should be under no illusions on this. The continuation of the regressive council tax simply damages our ability to support local government and those most in need.

“It is disappointing to see opposition parties failing to make any demands of government save for calling, impossibly, for more services but lower taxes. To this extent the whole of the Parliament is letting people down. We have to start of using the full powers of our Parliament to deliver tax reforms aimed at wealth and property, reforms which if implemented could raise £3.7 billion tax.”

Responding to the 2024/25 draft Budget, SCVO Chief Executive Anna Fowlie. said: “The draft Budget represents a missed opportunity to set out vital support for Scotland’s voluntary sector – at a time when it is being squeezed by the cost-of-living and running costs crises.  

“While we welcome the Scottish Government’s commitments to move towards Fair Funding for Scotland’s voluntary sector by 2026, there was little evidence of that today.  

“The UK Government delivered a modest but welcome package of running costs support for voluntary organisations in England – as part of the Spring Statement. Today, at the very least, the Scottish Government could have committed to doing the same here in Scotland. The sector is still waiting on any such commitment. 

“While we recognise the challenging financial environment, the sector needs more than warm words and missed opportunities. Just last month the First Minister told assembled voluntary organisations at the Gathering that he’ll move beyond warm words and put money where his mouth is. Today we didn’t see that.  

“We need to see meaningful support for the sector, with urgent progress on Fair Funding to safeguard essential services. We stand ready to support the Scottish Government to deliver that progress.” 

Joanna Elson CBE, Chief Executive at Independent Age: “We welcome the Scottish Government’s greater focus on older people in poverty in today’s Budget. The news that all devolved social security payments, including the Winter Heating Payment, have been uprated by inflation and that the fund for Discretionary Housing Payment has been increased will be a welcome relief to those struggling financially in later life.  

“However, these measures do not go far enough for the 150,000 older people now living in poverty in Scotland, a figure that has risen by a quarter in the last decade alone, now affecting 1 in 7. Today they really needed the Scottish Government to announce a clear, long-term strategy with legally binding targets and ambitions action to tackle pensioner poverty and reverse this frightening trend.  

“Older people in Scotland, including those in financial hardship, urgently need greater representation. We were disappointed that the Scottish Government didn’t use today’s announcement as an opportunity to announce funding for an Older People’s Commissioner.

“A Commissioner would give better representation across policy making and provide a crucial independent voice for people in later life. With 1 in 4 of us projected to be over 65 by 2040, there’s no time to waste. 

“While we welcome the measures announced today that will improve life for older people on low incomes, the Scottish Government need to go further and faster to address rising pensioner poverty in Scotland. Both a long-term solution to financial hardship in later life and an end to older people feeling ignored by those in power is needed. The time is now for Scotland to have a pensioner poverty strategy and an Older People’s Commissioner.” 

Jonathan Carr-West, Chief Executive, LGIU Scotland, said: “With one in four Scottish councils warning that they may be unable to balance their books next year, today’s budget will not offer much reassurance.

“The Verity House Agreement promised early budget engagement, and it promised ‘no surprises.’ This financial settlement does not meet either of those promises or provide councils with the funding they have told us they need. 

“A council tax freeze funded as though council tax were increased by 5% is equivalent to the rises that councils were planning for this year, but it denies them the increase in their tax base and thus undermines their finances next year and for years to come.

“The “additional support” promised all appears to be ring fenced to Scottish Government priorities rather than enabling democratically elected councils to make decisions about priorities in their areas. Again, this goes against the Verity House agreement.

“Before the budget, every council told us they were planning cuts to services, 97% that they were planning to increase charges, and 89% that they would have to spend their reserves. The funding announced in the settlement will not alleviate the need for these biting budget measures.

“The council tax freeze this year will not help residents affected by councils’ inevitable spending cuts and it will not help residents next year, when councils’ spending power is reduced further because their council tax base can’t increase in line with the amount they need. 

“Our recent survey shows just how strong the concerns are across local government. Only one respondent to our survey said they were confident in the sustainability of council finances. Not a single person said they were happy with the progress that had been made on delivering a sustainable finance system.

“Senior council figures widely condemned how limited their involvement in the pre-budget process was, and this funding settlement confirms the suspicions that led to only 8% of respondents believing the Scottish Government considers local government in wider policy decisions. 

Most worryingly, 8 separate councils (25% of all local authorities) warned us that they could be unable to fund their statutory services – the services they have to provide by law. The funding announced today will be no comfort to these struggling councils, who will now have to make even more difficult choices to make up for their funding shortfall. 

For the average resident, this means their life will get more expensive and their services will get worse. For some of the most vulnerable members of society, as councils warned us, it may mean that if nothing changes then there is not enough money to fund the services they rely on. 

“The funding settlement is not enough for councils to provide the services that millions of people across Scotland rely on. More than that though, it demonstrates that annual funding settlements of this type are not the right way to fund councils or to empower councils to tackle their long-term challenges.

“Councils should be given more powers over how they raise and spend their own money. This means ring-fencing and directed spending need to be reduced, as agreed at Verity House, and councils need to be free to set their own council tax.” 

Commenting on the budget, UNISON’s Scottish Secretary Lilian Macer, said: “Today’s budget is a bad day for local services and deals a further financial blow to local councils who are already struggling to balance the books and to deliver the vital services our communities rely on.

“Our public services are on their knees due to years of underinvestment and the Scottish government’s council tax freeze will be a disaster for local services. We need to see investment in public services and a council tax freeze stops investment in public services, in schools and in the NHS.

“The Scottish government had the chance to make big choices to raise more money for Scotland’s public services but while the measures on income tax are welcome, much more could and should have been done. We still have a government boasting of low business taxes at the same time that they are delaying urgent improvements to public services.

“The Deputy First Minister spoke of cutting the public service workforce – people need to be aware that job cuts mean service cuts. What communities across Scotland need is investment, not abandonment.

“While we welcome investment in the NHS, the Scottish government failed to say how this would be targeted to tackling the staffing crisis and ensuring proper funding so the safe staffing act can make the improvements the NHS so desperately needs.

“Given the Scottish government’s commitment to become a fair work nation by 2025, it’s concerning that there was no mention of fair work anywhere in the budget statement, particularly in social care, a sector in crisis.”

Responding to the Scottish Government’s Budget Stuart McMahon, Scotland Director of consumer group CAMRA whose members had been lobbying MSPs asking for a 75% business rates discount to help save pubs and breweries, said: 

“Pubgoers will be deeply disappointed by the lack of help for most of our locals today. Whilst 100% rates relief for hospitality businesses in island communities will be welcomed, failing to pass on extra money from the UK Government to help with business rates for the rest of our hospitality businesses is undoubtedly a blow and puts many of our pubs at risk of permanent closure.  

“Yet again it seems that the Scottish Government just doesn’t understand the importance of our pubs, social clubs and breweries as a vital part of our social fabric – bringing communities together and providing a safe, regulated environment to enjoy a drink with friends and family. Our locals are community hubs that need and deserve help to make sure that they survive and thrive.  

“With reports that pubs are closing at a faster rate here than elsewhere in the UK, Scottish Government ministers urgently need to re-think the decision not to give our locals the 75% discount with business rates bills that pubs south of the border are receiving. The Scottish Government also needs to support consumers, pubs and breweries in the new year by ditching any plans to bring back restrictive bans on alcohol advertising.” 

In response to the Scottish Budget, Stephen Montgomery, Director of the Scottish Hospitality Group said:We are sorely disappointed that the Scottish Government has not delivered new emergency support for Scottish hospitality.

“Unless a hospitality business is located on the islands, this Budget offers no new support to Scottish hospitality to survive the unprecedented challenge of rising costs, inflation, and the legacy of the pandemic.

“The very real implication is that many Scottish hospitality businesses will struggle to survive, and customers will see prices increase. This will be a bitter pill to swallow for thousands of Scottish hospitality businesses, given English hospitality businesses will be benefitting from a 75% business rates discount for the next year. Our attention will now be focused on helping those hospitality businesses survive what will be a very challenging year to come.

“However, we welcome the Scottish Government’s commitment to exploring a long-term, fairer deal for hospitality on business rates. It is a ray of hope in an otherwise disappointing day for Scottish hospitality.

“This is a golden opportunity to deliver a fairer deal for Scottish hospitality once and for all. We have been engaged with the New Deal for Business Group for a number of months and it is time that the Scottish Government’s actions matched their words.

“The Finance Secretary has committed to introducing a long-term, fairer deal for Scottish hospitality at next year’s Budget. We will hold her feet to the fire to make sure she delivers on this promise.”

Scottish Budget 2024-25

Summary of UK Economic and Fiscal Outlook from Office of the Chief Economic Adviser

Disability supporters urged to respond to Edinburgh's budget consultation

LCIl logo

Local Disabled People’s Organisation Lothian Centre for Inclusive Living (LCiL) has responded to the City of Edinburgh Council’s (CEC) budget consultation and is encouraging other organisations and individuals to do the same.

CEC budget consultation 2015-16-Nov. 14

The organisation’s full response (see above) , acknowledges the financial pressure under which local authorities are operating but highlights the risks associated with implementing savings proposals which directly impact disabled people, people with long term conditions or older people and/or the organisations supporting them.

Of the council’s 69 savings proposals 25 directly target these services, and taken together represent 32% of the total of the overall suggested savings – almost ONE THIRD.

LCiL argues that  In a tough financial environment disabled people, people with long term conditions and older people are the first ones to feel the impact on their quality of life and on their ability to remain active and visible in their community. Targeting cuts to the very services that support them to live independently, and to remain members of their communities, would just lead to more exclusion and marginalisation, and increase the gap between those who have and who have not.

LCiL’s Chief Executive Florence Garabedian said: “There is still time to change the views of those who have proposed these savings and for CEC to explore the negative consequences which these could have on disabled people – people with long term conditions and older people.

“We urge those who are part of this constituency, and their supporters, to make sure their voices are heard before the consultation ends on 19 December.”

scales 2

The City of Edinburgh Council has published a range of materials about the budget consultation which you can access on the Consultation and Responses Section of the E-library, including:

For further details you can access information on their website at: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/budget

For an overview of the budget proposals visit here: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/20200/budget_and_finance/1136/budget_proposals_for_2015_2016

Deadline for responses is: 19 December 2014.