Edinburgh’s most deprived families bear bunt of legal aid crisis

  • New data reveals hundreds of legal aid ‘not-spots’ in Edinburgh – deprived communities with no civil legal aid firms
  • The 100 most deprived communities in Edinburgh have access to just local one legal aid firm
  • Some are even forced to represent themselves in court

Thousands of Edinburgh’smost deprived families could face the prospect of defending themselves in court because of a chronic shortage of civil legal aid firms.

New analysis by the Law Society of Scotland shows that the 100 most deprived communities in Edinburgh, resident to around 83,808 people, share local access to just one single civil legal aid firm*.

Legal aid is a critical service affecting a range of life-altering situations and is the only way Scotland’s poorest families can secure legal support. Often, it is during some of life’s tougher moments that people will find themselves in need of legal aid support.

Legal aid for civil court actions is only offered to people with a disposable income of less than £293 per month – above that amount, there is a cost to be paid, which can be up to full repayment of the legal aid cost.

The most common civil court cases include dealing with divorce and child contact or custody; adoption; immigration and asylum cases; and deportation. They also routinely involve securing compensation for medical negligence, securing social welfare payments and other financial situations.

This new analysis highlights the extent to which this crisis could impact Edinburgh’s most deprived, with just one civil legal aid firm in Edinburgh’s 50 most deprived areas. This firms is local to just 1,431 people, leaving a staggering 82,377 people in those areas without local support.

Even in the areas with local access, the sheer demand so heavily outstrips supply that those with local access to firms still may not successfully secure legal aid. This creates a significant delay to court proceedings and to families seeking resolutions in very difficult moments.

Now, high profile social commentator, activist and award-winning author Darren ‘Loki’ McGarvey has thrown his weight behind a new campaign to ensure the most vulnerable in society get the legal help they need.

Darren McGarvey said: “Just imagine standing in a courtroom on your own to argue your case, up against an experienced solicitor. Now imagine that the custody of your child is at stake. Or a life-changing pay-out after an industrial accident.

“The absurdity of that proposition, combined with inequalities within the justice, healthcare, and education systems, is exactly why I am supporting the Law Society of Scotland to highlight the real issues that real people in Edinburgh face. Something has to change.

“In a nation that prides itself on progressive social values, these figures should act as a stark warning. Those who are already most disadvantaged are having their last line of defence pulled away from them. The Scottish Government has let inflation quietly chip away at legal aid fees over the last two decades – now we need to catch up.”

The Law Society of Scotland is calling on the Scottish public to contact their local MSP if they share Darren McGarvey’s concerns and want action. It says the crisis is exacerbated by the fact that legal aid fees agreed in 1999 had only increased by 10%, compared to an inflation increase of 55%. The Scottish Government recently offered legal aid solicitors a 10.3% increase in their fees.

Murray Etherington, President of the Law Society of Scotland added: “Legal aid is a fundamental part of Scottish society. The lack of representation available to those who need it most continues to be an unresolved issue. We have to stop looking at it as just a problem for solicitors – it is a problem for everyone.

“The recently proposed Scottish Government increase in funding may provide a short-term sticking plaster, but it won’t address the deep wounds to the legal aid system caused by a generation of underfunding. Without further serious action, the huge decline we have seen in the number of registered civil legal aid firms will continue.

“If we are to continue to help the most deprived families in our society, we have to secure longer term, lasting investment in legal aid services. We hope these new figures bring home the struggles faced by so many people and urge the Scottish Government to take action.”

Fortrose Academy debaters take top prize at Holyrood

Scotland’s most talented young debaters took to the floor of the Holyrood Debating Chamber this week to take part in the final of a national competition.

Aimee Ross and Orla McMichael from Fortrose Academy were declared the winners after debating the emergence of ‘cancel culture’. Jenna Padget and Jennifer Chen from the High School of Glasgow came second. 

The Donald Dewar Memorial Debating Tournament is Scotland’s largest annual schools debating tournament and is open to pupils in all Scottish secondary schools.

Organised and run by the Law Society of Scotland, the tournament is dedicated to the memory of the former First Minister Donald Dewar MSP, who died in 2000.

It is the culmination of a tournament which involved 64 teams from schools across Scotland. Along the way, pupils have debated subjects ranging from university fees to arming the police as well as if civil disobedience is acceptable in tackling environmental issues.

Appearing in the final were pupils from the following schools:

  • Dunfermline High School, (Dunfermline);
  • Hutchesons Grammar School, (Glasgow Southside);
  • High School of Glasgow (Anniesland);
  • Fortrose Academy, (Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch)

Speaking after the event, Deputy Presiding Officer Liam McArthur MSP said: “I’m so pleased to once again welcome some of Scotland’s young people to the Parliament’s Debating Chamber for the culmination of this national competition. I’ve been so impressed by the quality of debate that we’ve heard.

“I send my best wishes to all the pupils who worked so hard to make the final of this competition. It was very closely fought but congratulations to Fortrose Academy for being awarded the overall prize.”

Deputy President of the Law Society of Scotland, Sheila Webster said: “It was brilliant to be back in such an impressive venue after a difficult few years. I’d like to thank the Scottish Parliament for hosting and also our chairperson, the judges and sponsors for their continued support.

“The judges had a hard time picking a winning team and the skills displayed by all teams were worthy of the Scottish Parliament. I was impressed to see the teams developing and then presenting strong arguments while under tight time pressure and without external help.” 

The winning school took home the top prize of £1000 and those coming second were awarded £250 from the Law Society of Scotland.