Millions of car finance customers to get payouts this year

FCA goes ahead with compensation scheme

Millions of motor finance customers will receive compensation this year under an FCA scheme for those treated unfairly by firms who broke the law by failing to disclose important information.

Consumers were denied the chance to seek a better deal and, in some instances, paid more for their loan.

The FCA has made several changes to the free to use scheme in response to conflicting feedback from consumers, their representatives, firms, manufacturers and industry bodies.

This ensures it is fair for consumers and proportionate for firms. The eligibility criteria have been tightened, average compensation increased for older agreements and a minimum 3% compensatory interest rate per annum added. Payouts will be capped in around 1 in 3 cases to ensure no one is put in a better position than had they been treated fairly.

12.1 million agreements made between 2007 and 2024 are now eligible for compensation, fewer than under the FCA’s original proposals. The average payout has increased to around £830 per agreement. The FCA estimates that 75% of eligible consumers will make a claim. If so, total redress paid would be £7.5bn.

Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: ‘We’ve listened to feedback to make sure the scheme is fair for consumers and proportionate for firms. It will put £7.5 billion back into people’s pockets.

‘Now we need everyone to get behind it and ensure millions get their money this year. Payouts should not be delayed any longer, especially as household bills come under greater pressure.

“Delivering compensation promptly also gives lenders the chance to rebuild trust, and means we can draw a line under the past and support a healthy motor finance market for the future.’

An industry-wide scheme is the most efficient way of compensating affected consumers while supporting the ongoing availability of competitively priced motor finance for millions who rely on it. Without such a scheme, the cost to lenders of dealing with complaints through the Ombudsman or courts is estimated to be over £6bn higher.

How the scheme will work

Motor finance loans taken out between 6 April 2007 to 1 November 2024 are covered.

There will be a short implementation period so firms can prepare. This will be up to:

  • 30 June 2026 for loans taken out from 1 April 2014.
  • 31 August 2026 for those agreed earlier.

Lenders will have 3 months from the end of the implementation period to inform complainants whether they’re owed compensation and how much. This means that people who have already complained or who complain before the end of the relevant implementation period will be compensated sooner.

Lenders will only contact people who haven’t complained if they are likely to be owed money. They have 6 months from the end of the relevant implementation period to do so. This avoids unnecessary and potentially confusing communication with people who won’t get compensation. Anyone not contacted has until 31 August 2027 to make a claim.

Claims for high value loans – amounts higher than 99.5% of other loans that year – are not covered by the scheme, which is designed for the mass market. These consumers can still complain to firms and the Financial Ombudsman Service.

People will only be compensated if they were not told clearly that either:

  1. Their dealer or broker set the interest rate to earn more commission (using a discretionary commission arrangement – DCA).
  2. The commission was high – at least 39% of the total cost of credit and 10% of the loan.
  3. The dealer or broker was using one lender or gave one lender the right of first refusal, (a so-called tied arrangement), except where lenders can evidence that there were visible links with a manufacturer and franchised dealer. For example, where they shared a common or similar name.

There will be some exceptions, with cases considered fair, if:

  • The commission was £120 or less for agreements beginning before 1 April 2014 and £150 or less from that date. Commission amounts below those levels are unlikely to have influenced the broker’s behaviour or consumer’s decision.
  • The borrower wasn’t charged interest.
  • The DCA wasn’t used to earn discretionary commission.
  • The lender can prove, in certain limited circumstances, it was fair not to disclose one of the arrangements above or that the consumer did not suffer any loss. For example, if no better deal was available.

Where the commission was very high (50% of the total cost of credit and 22.5% of the loan) and another relevant factor of unfairness existed, consumers will receive the commission paid.

For most people compensation will be made up of 2 parts, the average of:

  • The commission paid; and
  • The estimated loss, based on a percentage discount of the interest (APR) they paid – 17% for cases from April 2014 and 21% for earlier agreements, to reflect greater loss then.

Consumers should not be put back in a better position than they would have been had they been treated fairly or than those who suffered the most unfairness, so in around 1 in 3 cases, compensation will be capped.

Interest will be paid on compensation, based on the annual average Bank of England base rate per year plus 1%, at a minimum of 3% in any year.

The FCA has established a dedicated supervisory team, led by a Director, to monitor if firms are meeting the scheme’s rules and act if they’re not. If people disagree with their firm’s decision, the Financial Ombudsman will be able to assess whether the scheme rules have been followed.

The FCA has also joined with the Solicitors Regulation Authority, Information Commissioner’s Office and Advertising Standards Authority to launch a taskforce to tackle poor handling of motor finance claims by some claims management companies (CMCs) and law firms.

The taskforce is the latest measure by regulators to improve standards. The FCA has already removed or amended 800 misleading adverts, over 28,000 consumers have been able to exit contracts free of charge, and 3 CMCs reduced their high fees, protecting over 500,000 consumers.

Consumers can choose not to take part in the FCA’s compensation scheme and instead go to court, where they may get more or less compensation, based on the facts of their case. However, the outcome of a court claim is uncertain and accounting for legal fees they may pay, many consumers could end up with less. The FCA’s scheme is also likely to be faster and simpler.

Advice for motor finance customers

  • If you are concerned you were treated unfairly, make a complaint. People who complain before the relevant implementation period ends will be compensated sooner.
  • There is information on how to complain for free on the FCA website. There is no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, you could lose over 30% of any money you get.
  • If you don’t complain and are owed money, your lender should contact you by end 2026 for post 1 April 2014 agreements and end February 2027 for agreements started between 6 April 2007 and 31 March 2014.
  • Watch out for scams. You can check you are dealing with your genuine lender using the contact details listed on the FCA website or through the FCA’s new motor finance scams helpline. You shouldn’t pay a fee to access compensation, or share sensitive details such as your PIN or online banking details.

Aidan Rushby, CEO and founder of  car finance organisation Carmoola, said: “Millions of drivers could receive compensation after not being fully informed about how broker incentives affected the cost of their finance. The FCA has now confirmed a framework for putting that right.

“What matters now is whether drivers actually receive compensation quickly, clearly and without hassle.

“Redress must reflect genuine harm. But it must also be applied proportionately and consistently. Restoring confidence depends on delivering compensation clearly, consistently and as quickly as possible.

“Our research shows 73% of drivers say access to fair and affordable finance is crucial to owning a car, and 61% worry it could become harder to access. That balance is critical.

“We believe car finance should be simple to understand, transparent in how it works, and fair in how it treats people. Trust now has to be earned. That is a healthy shift for the market.

Parcel delivery problems reach record levels as 15 million people are let down on the doorstep

  • More than a third of people (37%) faced issues with their most recent parcel delivery. 
  • Royal Mail bag the top spot in the league table with 3.25 stars while Yodel trail behind in bottom place, failing to improve on last year’s score of 2 stars out of 5.
  • Half a decade since it first launched, Citizens Advice’s parcel league table lays bare how broken this market is.

A record 15 million people experienced a problem with their latest parcel delivery, new research by Citizens Advice has revealed. 

From chasing missing parcels, battling arduous complaints systems to even having accessibility requests ignored, Citizens Advice found that more than a third of people (37%) faced issues with their most recent delivery. The research, carried out in a snapshot one month period, reveals the rate of parcel problems remains at the highest levels seen in half a decade.

Now in its fifth year, the parcel league table shows Royal Mail scored the highest this year with an overall score of 3.25 out of 5 stars, while Yodel slip to the bottom with just 2 out of 5 stars – not making any improvement since last year. 

The charity’s league table looks at the top five delivery companies by parcel volume and measures their performance against criteria including customer service, delivery problems and how well they meet accessibility needs, such as people needing louder knocking or longer to answer the door.

Stuck in a rut of poor performance 

While Citizens Advice’s research shows there have been marginal shifts in scores over the last five years, the overall picture is one of consumers being persistently failed by parcel companies.

The charity found:

  • Accessibility is the worst performing area – despite Ofcom’s new condition requiring firms to give disabled consumers the opportunity to report their accessibility needs, scores this year have actually worsened, with Yodel placing last. Citizens Advice also found that three million people who have an accessibility requirement they would like to share (37%) are still unable to share their needs. Reasons include not being aware of where to share, or their accessibility need not being given as an option when placing an order. 
  • Complaints and customer service rankings remain stagnant – of the people who had experienced a problem with their delivery, almost half (47%) had a further issue trying to resolve the problem, such as a slow response, issues with automated systems (such as a chat bot) and having to contact a firm multiple times to get a response.
  • Frequent failures hitting people – the most common problems people faced with their last delivery include the driver leaving before they had time to get to the door (29%); their parcel being left in an insecure location (24%) and parcels arriving late (24%). 

The overall scores

RankCompanyDeliveryAccessibilityCustomer serviceTrustOverall scoresScore change
1Royal Mail3.22.83.443.25 out of 5
2Amazon Logistics3.21.83.53.83 out of 5
3 =DPD2.422.13.42.25 out of 5
3 =Evri2.41.62.722.25 out of 5
5Yodel2.41.42.21.82 out of 5

“I’ve had some leave parcels in the recycling bins on recycling day” – Mike’s story

Mike, in his 70s, has muscular dystrophy and uses two walking sticks, making it difficult to move quickly or bend down. He consistently asks parcel companies not to bring deliveries to his front door as he is unable to get there in time. Instead, he asks them to deliver parcels to his back door, which is closer to his home office and easier for him to get to.

But despite repeatedly telling retailers and parcel companies about his accessibility needs, firms still ignore his requests. As a result, parcels are often misdelivered, left exposed to the weather, not put in a designated safe space or with neighbours, or delivered to entirely wrong addresses.

“The biggest problem is just getting companies to deliver according to my instructions,” Mike says. 

“If nobody is in, delivery drivers are supposed to leave my parcels in a designated safe space. I chose that spot because it’s dry, out of the way, and I don’t have to bend down to pick anything up. But parcels rarely get left there. Instead, they just leave them outside, whether it’s raining, dry or otherwise. I’ve had some leave parcels in the recycling bins on recycling day. 

“It makes you awfully frustrated, and it makes you really fed up, to the point that I’m beginning to stop buying from retailers that use certain delivery companies. 

“I actually had one delivery agent chuck a parcel over the back gate onto the concrete floor, who said he’d handed it to the resident. I had the video showing him throwing it over the back gate then taking a picture saying he’d delivered it.”

Passing the parcel of responsibility

Ofcom introduced guidance on complaints and accessibility in 2023, but Citizens Advice says its research and Ofcom’s own findings show many parcel firms are still ignoring the rules. This isn’t a guidance problem – it’s a compliance one, and the charity is calling on Ofcom to monitor performance and fine the worst offenders.

Five years of league table analysis also shows repeated failures across the sector. Royal Mail, subject to stricter regulation, consistently performs well overall in the league table but the company offers consumers access to an independent dispute scheme (ADR) unlike other parcel providers. Citizens Advice says all consumers should have the same right to redress, no matter who delivers their parcel.

Dame Clare Moriarty, Chief Executive of Citizens Advice, said: “Ofcom has passed the parcel of responsibility for long enough.

“We’ve been doing the work of the regulator for five years now by holding parcel companies to account and speaking up for consumers who are bearing the brunt of persistently poor service. 

“Our league table has tracked parcel problems from warehouse to doorstep. We continue to see millions of people chasing lost parcels, having their accessibility needs ignored and hitting a brick wall when they try to complain.

“The question now is whether the regulator will take tougher action to improve the parcel market once and for all.”

Ofcom: Royals and reality dominate Britain’s most complained about show

Aura Print has found that over the past five years, Good Morning Britain has racked up nearly 92,000 Ofcom complaints, making it the most complained-about show in the UK.

Reality favourites like Love Island and outspoken presenters such as Julia Hartley-Brewer and Dan Wootton aren’t far behind, whilst royal-related shows such as Harry and Meghan’s Oprah appearance and the King’s Coronation sparked nearly 15,000 complaints in total.

Key findings:

  • Piers Morgan comments on Meghan Markle had the most complaints for a single broadcast: 57,973
  • Piers Morgan, Julia Hartley-Brewer and Dan Wootton are amongst the most complained about TV presenters in the UK
  • MAFS UK generated under 2,000 complaints, showing Love Island especially riles viewers
  • Royal coverage triggers complaints: King Charles Coronation (8,000 complaints) Oprah with Meghan & Harry (6,500)
  • Emmerdale takes the lead as the British soap with the most complains 
  • ITV is the station with the most complaints with over 210,000, followed by TalkTV with over 20,000 and GBNews with over 17,000

So, which TV shows are the most complained about of the past 5 years? 

RankProgrammeServiceNumber of complaints (2021-2025)
1Good Morning BritainITV191,890
2Love IslandITV266,252
3Julia Hartley-BrewerTalkTV18,525
4Dan Wootton TonightGB News9,207
5King Charles III: The CoronationITV18,389
6This MorningITV7,387
7Celebrities: What’s Happened to Your Face?Channel 57,082
8Oprah with Meghan and HarryITV6,456
9I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here!ITV16,203
10Jeremy VineChannel 54,982
11Big BrotherITV1 / ITV24,678
12LorraineITV4,675
13Breakfast with Kay BurleySky News3,467
14EmmerdaleITV12,405
15Vanessa51,986
16Loose WomenITV1,799
17Married at First Sight UKE41,748
18Coronation StreetITV1,348
19Lee Anderson’s Real WorldGB News1,668
20Friday Night LiveChannel 41,630
21HeadlinersGB News1,498
22Ant PayneCapital FM1,430
23Naked EducationChannel 41,413
24The Brit AwardsITV11,157
25Today with Samantha WashingtonSky News1,270

Please find the full data set of all Ofcom complaints 2021-2025, here.

Good Morning Britain has racked up nearly 92,000 Ofcom complaints, making it the most complained-about show in the UK.

2021 and 2024 stand out as the years with the highest number of complaints. The single most complained-about episode was on 8 March 2021, with 57,973 complaints, coinciding with the infamous Piers Morgan episode discussing Meghan Markle’s mental health. 

Aura Print’s research found that Good Morning Britain sees occasional explosive spikes linked to high-profile controversies, but day-to-day episodes generate around 50–300 complaints each.

Reality favourites like Love Island follow with over 66,000 complaints, proving that when drama hits the screen, Brits love to dial in. Key moments such as explosive rows, Casa Amor, movie nights, and provocative content generate the bulk of complaints for this show.

In comparison, Married at First Sight UK has generated less than 2k complaints in its run, showing that Love Island especially riles up Brits.

Second to Piers Morgan, Julia Hartley-Brewer is one of the most complained-about presenters, racking up 18,500 complaints, more than double the 9,207 complaints against GB News’ Dan Wootton

Some shows have sent viewers dialing like never before, particularly when the royals are involved. Coverage of King Charles III’s coronation in May 2023 triggered more than 8,000 complaints, while Oprah with Meghan and Harry received almost 6.5k complaints.

Even fan-favourite entertainment shows aren’t safe. I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here! and Big Brother collectively pulled in over 10,000 complaints, with moments like bug-eating trials and live evictions sending viewers into a frenzy. 

The most complained about episodes of TV in the past 5 years

ProgrammeServiceAir DateNumber of complaints (2021-2025)
Good Morning BritainITV8 + 9 March 202157,973
Love IslandITV26 August 202124763
Julia Hartley-BrewerTalkTV3 January 202415536
Dan Wootton TonightGB News26 September 20238846
Good Morning BritainITV15 August 20248419
Good Morning BritainITV15 August 20248201
Celebrities: What’s Happened to Your Face?Channel 522 April 20217082
Oprah with Meghan and HarryITV8 March 20214,398
Love IslandITV228 July 20214330
King Charles III: The CoronationITV16 May 20234165
King Charles III: The CoronationITV16 May 20234087

Leading the charge is Good Morning Britain, whose 8 March 2021 broadcast racked up a staggering 57,973 complaints, the most for any single episode in recent history.

Ofcom has since reminded broadcasters to provide timely warnings or signposting for sensitive content, especially around topics such as mental health and suicide. Their statement included:

Mr Morgan’s comments were potentially harmful and offensive to viewers, and we recognise the strong public reaction to them. But we also took full account of freedom of expression. Under our rules, broadcasters can include controversial opinions as part of legitimate debate in the public interest, and the strong challenge to Mr Morgan from other contributors provided important context for viewers.”

Love Islands 6 August 2021 episode received 24,763 complaints after contestant Faye Winters outburst at her interest Teddy Soares. The outburst sparked widespread viewer complaints around whether the show did enough to step in.

The most complained about TV episode of 2024 was Julia Hartley-Brewer’s TalkTV show on 3 January 2024 provoked 15,536 complaints,

Dan Wootton Tonight racked up 8,846 complaints when Laurence Fox made derogatory remarks about Ava Evans following her appearance on the BBC’s Politics Live, calling her “pathetic and embarrassing” and questioning her appeal to men.

Edinburgh MPs initiate dialogue between tenants and Places for People

THREE Edinburgh Labour MPs – Tracy Gilbert (Edinburgh North and Leith), Dr Scott Arthur (Edinburgh South West), and Chris Murray (Edinburgh East and Musselburgh) – came together with Places for People Scotland and tenants from across the city on Wednesday to build on joint engagement activity addressing housing queries.

After being elected, Tracy Gilbert MP noticed a trend in complaints and organised this meeting to support both tenants and Places for People Scotland.

In a first-of-its-kind collaboration, the Edinburgh MPs arranged the meeting with Places for People Scotland and Edinburgh Tenants Federation to support local tenants to proactively seek support on matters relating to their communities.

The meeting is a further step in the work Places for People Scotland has undertaken in the past 18 months in increasing customer engagement across the city.

The meeting covered matters raised by customers including understanding service charges, heating, and repairs and maintenance, as well as customer engagement.

By bringing all parties together, the MPs sought to bring together tenants’ voices to continue open, constructive, and effective dialogue.

Tracy Gilbert MP said: “Tenants deserve to feel heard and supported by their housing provider. As Edinburgh MPs, we were pleased to facilitate this meeting so residents could raise their concerns directly and begin to build stronger channels of communication.

“A lot of the issues raised centred on the transparency of bills from factors and the lack of clarity in communications.

“We hope that over the coming months these matters can be resolved, giving residents the confidence and reassurance they deserve.”

Dr Scott Arthur MP added: “Tenants in Edinburgh South West have understandably lost confidence in the service provided by Places for People Scotland.

“I’m therefore pleased that this meeting offered a chance to reset the relationship. It’s now in everyone’s best interest to work together constructively to rebuild trust and deliver the high-quality services that residents rightly expect and deserve.”

Chris Murray MP said: “I welcome Places for People Scotland’s commitment to an open, engaged, and transparent relationship with their tenants – demonstrated by our community meeting tonight.

“However, an engaged, transparent, and supportive housing provider and property factor should not be an exception, but an expectation.

“I will continue to work alongside residents, my fellow MPs, and Places for People Scotland, to ensure this is achieved.”

Kelly Brown, Director of Places for People Scotland, commented: “We recognise that there have been times in recent years where our communication with customers should have been better and we have taken the appropriate steps to improve this.

“Yesterday’s meeting marked another positive step forward, demonstrating what can be achieved when we work together.

“We are always listening. Over the last 18 months, we’ve worked closely with our customers and local MPs to improve the overall customer experience. For those whose homes are powered by a district heating system, we’ve brought in an internal expert to review all tariffs and procure a new partner.

“We remain committed to driving further improvements to ensure we provide a service that our customers can be proud of.”

Housing is a matter devolved to the Scottish Parliament.

Spotlight on dangerous and illegal use of off-road bikes across Scotland

The charity Crimestoppers Scotland has launched a new campaign appealing for information about the dangerous and illegal use of off-road motorbikes and other mechanically propelled bikes across Scotland.

There has been rising concerns and reports from communities across Scotland over the illegal use of off-road bikes and other mechanically propelled bikes including mopeds, e-bikes and e-scooters.

Complaints often centre around off-road bikes becoming a threat to the public as the bikes are ridden recklessly in residential areas, town centres, on pavements and in green spaces – with no concern from the riders for their own safety or that of the public.

Crimestoppers spoke to people in Scotland who has been directly affected by dangerous and illegal use of off-road bikes:

  • A Farmer in Dumfries told us his fields had been ripped up overnight, costing thousands in repairs and increased security costs.
  • An elderly lady in Edinburgh almost stepped in front of a bus to prevent a bike on the pavement from crashing into her.
  • In February Whinhill Golf Club in Greenock experienced extensive damage to the greens and fairways.
Angela Parker

Angela Parker, National Manager, Crimestoppers Scotland, said: “We heard from many people who felt scared and threatened by the increased use of illegal off-road bikes. This illegal activity also damages the environment and heritage, taking years to recovers and costing thousands to repair.

“Our campaign aims to support communities in reporting anonymously to our charity and providing information on where people can safely and legally enjoy riding their bike.”

Victims and Community Safety Minister Siobhian Brown, said: “I’m pleased to support this important campaign.

“Using off-road vehicles illegally is dangerous, anti-social and can cause huge disruption to residents in local communities as well as causing damage to parks, playing fields and the natural environment.

Crimestoppers enables individuals to report crime anonymously and these reports help the police to tackle this crime. Together, we can make a real difference.”

Councillor Stephen McCabe, leader of Inverclyde Council, said: These bikes are causing untold damage and misery in our community, damaging public and private property and leaving residents feeling scared and intimidated, which is simply unacceptable.

“Areas like Grieve Road have been particularly affected by the rise in off-road bikes and the course at Whinhill Golf Club, which the council owns, has also been damaged so there is a cost to the taxpayers to repair the fairways and greens, not to mention the inconvenience caused for golfers and staff.

“As with most things, the authorities need the help of the public to tackle this problem by reporting illegal and anti-social activity and Crimestoppers is a way in which people can do that and do it completely anonymously.”

Useful information includes:

  • Who is riding them illegally and what they were wearing?
  • The names of those responsible for putting the public and themselves in danger.
  • Where are they being stored?
  • The exact location, date and time the bike/s were seen?
  • Anything distinctive: colour, make, number plate details.

If you own or ride an off-road bike or other mechanically propelled bike, (that includes e-bikes and e-scooters), you must ensure that you comply with UK law. Our campaign webpage gives useful information on all manner of bikes.

To pass on information about the illegal use of off-road bikes completely anonymously, visit the Crimestoppers website (Crimestoppers-uk.org). You can fill in a safe and secure form or you can call the 24/7 UK-based Contact Centre on 0800 555 111. Young people can also report crime via the charity’s youth service website Fearless.org.

Please note: With Crimestoppers-uk.org and Fearless.org, computer IP addresses are never traced and no-one will ever know you contacted them.

For telephone calls to Crimestoppers via 0800 555 111, there is no caller line display, no 1471 facility and calls have never been traced.

The Big British Complaint Survey

In a recent survey by marketing agency FATJOE, 3000 Brits chose their top three annoyances from a list of ten typical British problems.

The findings give us a clear look at what bothers people in the UK the most, from strict rules about queuing to how tea is made!

Queue-Jumping: The Unforgivable Breach

An astonishing 68% (2040 respondents) cited queue-jumping as one of their top three irritants. In Britain, the queue is more than a way to wait; it’s a symbol of fairness and order, making queue-jumpers public enemy number one.

Unsolicited Advice on Social Media: The Digital Irritant

Social media missteps snagged the second spot, with 63% (1890 respondents) flagging unsolicited advice as a top annoyance. It seems the British reticence for confrontation extends into the digital realm, where unasked-for opinions are unwelcome.

Public Transport Etiquette: The Communal Test

The trials of public transport etiquette were highlighted by 59% (1770 respondents), underscoring the communal desire for consideration and personal space in shared environments.

Neighbourhood Noises: Disturbing the Peace

Close behind, 55% (1650 respondents) lamented over neighbourhood noises, from late-night parties to early morning DIY projects, proving the British home is indeed one’s castle, expected to be free from invasion by sound.

Environmental Disregard: Spoiling the Landscape

Littering and environmental neglect concerned 52% (1560 respondents), a testament to the value placed on the UK’s green spaces and the collective responsibility felt towards preserving them.

Customer Service Frustrations: The Expectation of Excellence

Customer service failures vexed 49% (1470 respondents), reflecting the high standards Brits hold for service interactions, where efficiency and politeness are paramount.

Tea Making Rituals: The Proper Brew

In a nation of tea lovers, 45% (1350 respondents) were irked by improper tea-making techniques, showcasing the deep cultural roots of this daily ritual. It’s worth noting, 35% of these respondents were northern…

Weather Conversations: A Predictable Pain Point

Surprisingly, 42% (1260 respondents) expressed mild annoyance at the omnipresent weather chat, hinting at a complex relationship with one of the nation’s most enduring conversation starters.

Political Discourse: The Inescapable Topic

Political discussions, including the fatigue from constant debate and division, frustrated 38% (1140 respondents), indicating a desire for respite in a highly politicised era.

Dining Etiquette: The Social Minefield

Lastly, dining etiquette, from phone usage to bill splitting, was a concern for 35% (1050 respondents), illuminating the nuances of social conduct in public spaces.

Joe Davies, from FATJOE says: “This survey offers a clear snapshot of life in Britain, showing how much people value respect, order, and tradition.

“From the importance of queuing to how tea is made, the results explore the things that really annoy Brits. They show a society that prioritises fairness, privacy, and good manners.

“As we go about our everyday lives, it’s these common frustrations that truly reveal who we are as a nation.”

Making a drama out of a comedy: Pleasance, Sadowitz and free speech

WAS THE PLEASANCE RIGHT TO CANCEL SECOND SADOWICZ SHOW?

THE ROW over the cancellation of Jerry Sadowwitz’s show at the EICC shows no sign of abating.

The Pleasance axed the controversial comedian’s second show at the venue following ‘an unprecedented number of complaints’. Pleasance chose not to go into further detail about the nature of the complaints following the cancellation of Saturday’s show.

However in a further statement yesterday, The Pleasance said: “We became immediately aware of content that was considered, among other things, extreme in its racism, sexism, homophobia and misogyny.

“We will not associate with content which attacks people’s dignity and the language used on stage was, in our view, completely unacceptable.

“We received an unprecedented number of complaints that could not be ignored and we had a duty to respond.”

Late last night Sadowicz, a veteran of the Edinburgh Fringe, tweeted:

It seems incredible that any Scottish venue would be unaware of the controversial nature of Jerry Sadowitz’s humour – it’s not as if he’s some unknown new kid on the block!

If Jerry Sadowitz’s brand of humour ‘does not align with the Pleasance values’ why book him in the first place?

‘Serious failings’ at ethical standards body

“It is disturbing to see so many failings in an organisation, not least because it deals directly with concerns raised by members of the public”

Public trust in the body that investigates complaints about the behaviour of MSPs and councillors is now at risk because of serious failings in the way it is run.

The Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland (CESPLS) assesses complaints about the conduct of MSPs, local authority councillors and members of public bodies and then decides which to investigate.

Failings identified by the appointed auditor include:

  • an absence of openness and transparency
  • a breakdown in key relationships with stakeholders and within its own office
  • no effective scrutiny or challenge which might have flagged up issues earlier

The Commissioner’s Office has since accepted 22 recommendations made by the appointed auditor and has made progress in addressing issues raised.

Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland, said: “It is disturbing to see so many failings in an organisation, not least because it deals directly with concerns raised by members of the public.

“It is vital that progress underway continues and that the recommendations made by the auditor are implemented.

“The overarching risk is that there will be a loss of public trust in the ability of the Commissioner’s Office to properly investigate and consider complaints made against individuals in public life in Scotland.”

STATEMENT FROM THE ETHICAL STANDARDS COMMISSIONER

Audit Scotland today published a Section 22 report* regarding this office (as above). The report and further details can be found on Audit Scotland’s website: Report: The 2020/21 audit of the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.

The report has been made in relation to serious issues identified in the audit relating to 2020/21.

Ian Bruce was appointed as Acting Commissioner on 20 April 2021 and has instituted a series of remedies. These include:

  • the production of a revised strategic plan for the next three years, which now incorporates the values that were missing from the previous version and clear statements of intent about how the office will fulfil its statutory obligations in accordance with the expectations of the Parliament, public and stakeholders
  • a new biennial business plan covering all office functions and addressing each of the auditor’s recommendations
  • the reinstitution of Senior Management Team (SMT) meetings in accordance with previous good governance arrangements and re-eagement with our Advisory Audit Board, whose members are drawn from the independent members of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s AAB
  • the recruitment of three new Investigating Officers and a new Corporate Services Officer, to ensure all office functions are appropriately covered
  • meaningful re-engagement with the SPCB and on-going communications with the SPCB and the Parliament’s Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee to keep the Parliament updated on our situation and plans
  • meaningful and on-going engagement with all stakeholder organisations, including the Standards Commission for Scotland, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA), the Society of Local Authority Lawyers & Administrators in Scotland (SOLAR) and the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE)
  • ensuring that the directions issued by the Standards Commission are complied with.

Progress to rebuild the organisation and its relationships with stakeholders is well underway.

The Acting Commissioner Ian Bruce stated: “I am grateful for the auditors’ work on the review and have welcomed their recommendations, the majority of which are addressed in our strategic and business plans.

“I have been grateful, also, to the SPCB and the Standards Commission for Scotland for their support since my appointment and their recognition of the many changes that I have already made.

“I and the entire team are dedicated to working in accordance with our new plans and the new values that we have adopted as an organisation. It is incumbent on me and on all of the staff to earn the trust of the public and the many stakeholder organisations that rely on our effective operation as an office. We are absolutely committed to doing so.”

Teletext faces court action unless it pays over £7m in refunds

Teletext Holidays will face legal action unless it repays over £7 million to customers whose package holidays were cancelled due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

On 4 February, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced that it was opening an investigation into Teletext Holidays after receiving hundreds of complaints.

These showed that people were not receiving refunds they were owed within 14 days, as required by law, for package holidays cancelled by the company due to pandemic restrictions.

The CMA wrote to Truly Holdings Ltd., the company that operates Teletext Holidays and also AlphaRooms.com, in March, setting out in detail its concerns and giving the company an opportunity to address them.

The CMA told the firm it could avoid any potential court action by signing formal commitments – known as ‘undertakings’ – to refund affected consumers and ensure compliance with the Package Travel Regulations going forward.

However, Teletext has not agreed to provide undertakings that are sufficient to address the CMA’s concerns.

The CMA has now informed Teletext Holidays that it is preparing to take court action and will launch proceedings if it does not repay the outstanding refunds, or commit to do so, without unnecessary delay.

Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, said: There must be no more delays to Teletext refunding customers for holidays they could not take because of the pandemic. It is unacceptable that many have already waited months for the refunds they are legally entitled to.

“We take very seriously the ongoing failure of Teletext Holidays to meet its obligations. The firm must now comply with the law and commit to refunding its customers. If it does not do so, we will not hesitate to pursue this case in court.”

Rory Boland, Which? Travel Editor, said: “We have received countless complaints from Teletext Holidays customers who have been battling for refunds for cancelled holidays for more than a year, so while the regulator’s action is welcome customers will be angry that they still don’t have money they are legally due.

“Teletext is one of many holiday providers that have attempted to shirk their legal responsibilities to refund customers for cancelled trips, highlighting the need for industry-wide reform.

“The government must ensure there are better protections for holidaymakers’ money, while the Civil Aviation Authority – which has been unable to take much meaningful action against airlines holding up the refund process by withholding money from holiday companies – must be given stronger powers.”

The announcement follows ‘significant action’ by the CMA in relation to holiday cancellations during the coronavirus pandemic.

The CMA has written to over 100 package holiday firms to remind them of their obligations to comply with consumer protection law, and has already secured refund commitments from LoveHolidaysLastminute.comVirgin Holidays, and TUI UK.

Further information on this case can be found on the COVID-19 cancellations: package holidays web page.

PPI, bank accounts, payday loans & credit cards top Scotland’s financial complaints

Scotland’s consumers most often ask the Financial Ombudsman Service for help resolving problems with PPI, payday loans, current accounts, packaged bank accounts and credit cards, its complaints data shows. Continue reading PPI, bank accounts, payday loans & credit cards top Scotland’s financial complaints