BBC to take immediate action as it publishes independent review into culture

The review heard from around 2,500 employees and freelancers through one-to-one meetings, group discussions, a survey and written submissions

The BBC has said it will take immediate action to improve workplace culture, after publishing a comprehensive independent report. 

The report from Change Associates, led by Executive Chairman and Founder Grahame Russell, found no evidence of a toxic culture, but in a series of detailed findings and recommendations it highlighted key areas for improvement. 

The review heard from around 2,500 employees and freelancers; through one-to-one meetings, group discussions, a survey and written submissions. The review was commissioned by the BBC Board in August 2024, with work beginning in October. 

The report – published today – found the majority of people who work for the BBC are proud to do so and describe loving their jobs.  

Some staff, however, thought there were a minority of people at the BBC – both on and off-air – who were able to behave unacceptably without it being addressed. 

“Even though they are small in number, their behaviour creates large ripples which negatively impact the BBC’s culture and external reputation,” the report concludes. 

The BBC Board has fully accepted the report and its findings, as has BBC management. Both view it as a catalyst for meaningful change – to reinforce expectations around behaviour and act more decisively when standards are not met. 

BBC Chair Dr Shah told staff today: “There is a minority of people whose behaviour is simply not acceptable. And there are still places where powerful individuals – on and off screen – can abuse that power to make life for their colleagues unbearable.  

“The report makes several recommendations that prioritise action over procedural change – which is exactly right. It also addresses some deep-seated issues: for example, the need to make sure everyone can feel confident and not cowed about speaking up. 

“I support the idea that we need to reinforce the behavioural expectations and standards we have for everyone who works with or for the BBC.” 

He added: “In the end, it’s quite simple: if you are a person who is prepared to abuse power or punch down or behave badly, there is no place for you at the BBC.” 

Director-General Tim Davie said: “This report represents an important moment for the BBC and the wider industry. It provides clear, practical recommendations that we are committed to implementing at pace. I’m grateful to everyone who took part and contributed. 

“The action we are taking today is designed to change the experience of what it is to be at the BBC for everyone and to ensure the values we all sign up to when we arrive here – the values that, for most of us, are what made us want to come to the BBC in the first place – are lived and championed by the whole organisation each and every day.” 

The BBC is taking immediate action from today, including: 

  • Launching a refreshed and strengthened Code of Conduct, with specific guidance for on-air presenters. 
  • Implementing a more robust Disciplinary Policy, with updated examples of misconduct and clear consequences. 
  • Requiring all TV production partners to meet Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) industry standards. 
  • Rolling out a new ‘Call It Out’ campaign to promote positive behaviour, empower informal resolution where appropriate, and challenge poor conduct. 
  • Introducing clear Pledges for anyone raising concerns, setting out what they can expect from the BBC.  

The BBC will build on this over the coming months to embed long-term change by:  

  • Updating all future employment and freelance contracts to set out clear expectations around behaviour.  
  • Transforming how we manage concerns and cases, launching a new Resolving Concerns Helpline to help address issues earlier; providing a single point of contact for each case when concerns are raise, along with improved communication and support. To ensure cases are managed with rigour, consistency, and urgency, there will be investment in new resources to support those handling complex cases.  
  • Training all managers on our updated Code of Conduct and values and require them to lead regular team discussions on culture and behaviour.  
  • Introducing in-person inductions for all new joiners, with a strong emphasis on values and expected behaviours.  
  • Conducting regular, targeted culture checks within divisions to monitor sentiment, identify issues, and intervene swiftly where needed.  
  • Implementing succession planning for our most senior on-air roles.  
  • Expanding HR support with additional resources and capacity  

The Executive has agreed to update the Board on progress against its plan at regular intervals. 

Soapbox: Revolution – or evolution of delusion?

So Russell Brand’s no longer just a comedian, he’s a campaigner. But like him or loathe him at least he makes you think, argues Broughton High School student ROSS COWPER: 

revolution

Over the past year Russell Brand has become some sort of liberating Jesus for some younger people in particular.

Born 1975 in Gray’s Essex, Russell Brand decided from a relatively early age that to get out of the run down place he lived, he would have to ‘better’ himself by becoming rich, famous or even both.

Russel got his wish by presenting for MTV, but it was his excessive drug use that kept giving him problems in the infancy of his career. In 2008 he resigned from the BBC for a prank call to Andrew Sachs; soon most people were not taking him seriously, and it was’t because of his comedic status.

Over the last year, following his guest editing for the New Statesman, Russell took to a new step in his career and life. He’s changed his opinions: either because he is in a better circumstances, or genuinely thinks that money and fame is not the way out. Following a Jeremy Paxman interview on Newnight, Russell Brand’s words became viral overnight on Twitter.

Russell actively encouraged that, to bring about change, the British people should’t vote. He explained that there must be a “massive redistribution of wealth” and accused ‘big business’ as a major player in the world’s corrupt societies.

Since the release of his book on the 25 October, ‘Revolution’ has unquestionably came under fire from political commentators, reviewers and from some sections some of the public. In his book Russell Brand argues that politicians now have to bend over to the media 24/7, in an attempt to make sure they look desirable with indisputable charisma to become next in line to inherit the idiotic throne of what PM has become.

Over the last decade especially the position has been filled with awkward fake smiling ones, to who try appease the ‘great’ British public that Romanians are taking the biscuit now, and its time for the reclaiming of our land!

Now don’t get me wrong, there are some good politicians out there, but many TV voxpop interviews in town centres show people saying they think all politicians don’t do a good job, or any job for that matter – it seems almost a disease to think that one could actually help you.

It does appear that some at the Guardian, the Daily Mail and the Telegraph do not agree with what Russell says in his book: he has been questioned on his books content – or for the lack of it. It can also be said that many of these political commentators are from higher class backgrounds, and they do have pacts to keep with certain parties after all. So who could blame them, they do have a job to keep!

So with Russell Brand posing different questions, and to this higher classed level of politicians, he may not have the most expanded substance in certain chapters of his book, but he is making a considerable noise.

I think it is the challenging the social norm of the political business-minded elite that are frightened of (especially the commentators). This is precisely why there has been so much noise recently over the matter; not the ‘revolution’ as such, but potential talk of change for poorer people in Britain.

In my opinion the book does contain some fallacies, but it is about learning the horrid inequality and wrongly distribution power of wealth. If anyone can get that through to people by even having to use the word ‘revolution’, then they have done something most politicians can’t.

Britain may be a long way away from the uprising, and the discarding of a golden statue of David Cameron put up by taxpayers money but ripped from it’s foundations by the people. We may be waiting some time …

IMG_4200