Report sets out ‘”devastating impact” of Westminster’s welfare cuts

Low income families across Scotland will be thousands of pounds a year worse off per year because of welfare cuts imposed by the UK government, a new report has found. The Scottish Government report, ‘the Impact of UK Welfare Policy on Families with Children’, looks at what the policies implemented since 2015 will mean for families. Continue reading Report sets out ‘”devastating impact” of Westminster’s welfare cuts

Persevere: Victory for Leithers as Registrar’s stays open!

Brock welcomes rethink on Registry Office closure – but says the fight isn’t over yet

Deidre Brock MP has hailed “victory for the Leithers” over news that Edinburgh Council has backed down over its plans to close Leith Registrars Office, putting them on hold until a public consultation has been  held. A petition to save the Registrar gathered 4000 signatures in just a couple of days, showing the massive support from Leithers for the service. Continue reading Persevere: Victory for Leithers as Registrar’s stays open!

Greens reveal extent of benefit cap carnage

GREEN REPORT: EXTENT OF HOUSEHOLDS HIT BY BENEFIT CAP REVEALED

The City of Edinburgh Council area has seen a rise of 302% in the number of households being affected by the UK government’s new benefit cap, new analysis by the Scottish Greens has revealed. Continue reading Greens reveal extent of benefit cap carnage

“Civic vandalism”: Brock urges Leithers to sign up to save Registrars Office

Three thousand signatories in just one day

The pressure on Edinburgh Council to reverse its decision to close Leith Registrars Office increased today as it was revealed that a public petition against it gathered nearly 3,000 signatures in just one day.  The petition, started by local MP Deidre Brock, calls on the council to keep the office open and says that it was part of the settlement Leith got from Edinburgh when the two merged in 1920. Continue reading “Civic vandalism”: Brock urges Leithers to sign up to save Registrars Office

Leith Registrar’s office closure: Brock calls for rethink

leith registrars office

Deidre Brock MP has called for an urgent rethink of council plans to close Leith Registrar’s Office. Ms Brock only heard of the plans recently from a constituent who was making enquiries about booking a wedding there, with services set to be moved up to the City Chambers from October this year. Continue reading Leith Registrar’s office closure: Brock calls for rethink

More children on antidepressants: Greens comment

Alison Johnstone MSP, Health & Children spokesperson for the Scottish Greens, has responded to figures showing four times as many children under 13 were prescribed antidepressants last year as just seven years ago. The figures, obtained by BBC Scotland, show that last year 252 children aged 12 and under were given antidepressants while in 2009/10 it was 57. Continue reading More children on antidepressants: Greens comment

Referendums: breaking the mould of party politics?

The Indyref and Brexit referendums have ‘completely transformed’ the party political system in Scotland, according to a new academic study. The British Election Study’s A tale of two referendums – the 2017 election in Scotland, has concluded that the referendums, which cut across political party lines, have brought about ‘major disturbances’ to the ordered party system.

The study, by Dr Chris Prosser and Prof Ed Fieldhouse from Manchester University, examined how voters changed their preferences between the 2015 and 2017 elections, focusing on how they voted on independence and Brexit.

For both political anoraks and those interested in our changing democracy, it’s an interesting read …

Only two years after the astonishing rise of the Scottish National Party at the 2015 election, the SNP juggernaut seemed to come to a crashing halt.

Although the SNP remained the largest party in Scotland at the 2017 election, they lost more than a quarter of their vote share and 21 of the 56 seats they had won in 2015. Conversely, the Scottish Conservatives performed exceptionally well, nearly doubling their vote share from 2015, picking up 12 seats, and becoming the second largest party in Scotland (the first time they have beaten Labour at a general election in Scotland since 1959). Labour modestly improved their vote share by 2.8% and picked up six seats, and the Liberal Democrats managed to gain three seats despite a slight decrease in their share of the vote.

What explains these sudden changes in electoral fortunes? We have previously examined how the 2014 Independence referendum lead to the rise of the SNP in 2015 and showed how the political divisions created by a referendum can overrule traditional party loyalty, leading to dramatic changes in the party system. In this blog, we use the newly released 2017 British Election Study Internet Panel datato explore how the interaction of two referendums – on Scottish independence and the UK’s membership of the EU – helps explain the outcome of the 2017 election in Scotland. In a separate blog, we also examine the impact of Brexit on the 2017 election in the rest of Britain.

In terms of party policy, the Scottish independence referendum created clear divisions in Scottish politics. The SNP, the cheerleaders for independence, were unambiguously in favour of staying in the EU, and after the vote tried to leverage Brexit to force a second independence referendum with the aim of keeping Scotland in the EU. The Scottish Conservatives, united against independence, were divided over Brexit during the EU referendum campaign, but took a clear stance in favour of Brexit following the referendum result (albeit one that is generally seen as more soft-Brexit supporting than their English counterparts). Scottish Labour, also against independence, tried to carve out a position on the EU in between the SNP and the Conservatives.

Amongst voters, the EU referendum clearly cut across the divisions over Scottish independence, with about 60% of both ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ voters in the 2014 referendum voting to remain in the EU. Using data from the British Election Study Internet panel on how people voted on four occasions – the 2014 Independence referendum, 2016 EU referendum, and the 2015 and 2017 general elections – we now examine how the two referendums interacted to produce the outcome of the 2017 election. In order to do so, we analyse the 2015 to 2017 vote flows amongst four categories of respondents, grouped according to their combination of referendum votes (excluding respondents who did not vote in one or more of the four electoral events):

Yes/Remain voters (27% of sample)

Amongst these voters, whose votes on independence and the EU are congruent with the SNP’s positions, we can see that the vast bulk (about 9 in 10) voted SNP in 2015 and all but a small proportion (about 1 in 10) stayed loyal to the SNP. They also managed to win over the majority of Green voters in this group.

Yes/Leave voters (17%)

In 2015, around 9 in 10 Yes/Leave voters supported the SNP – the same proportion as Yes/Remain voters. Unlike the Yes/Remain SNP voter however, Yes/Leave voters were much more likely to defect from the SNP in 2017, with 4 in 10 switching to another party, with similar proportions going to the Conservatives and Labour. It appears that just as Labour’s position on the Independence referendum lost them votes to the SNP, many 2015 SNP voters were driven away by the party’s strong pro-remain stance.

No/Remain voters (34%)

No/Remain voters are the largest of the four groups in the Scottish electorate. In 2015 Labour dominated this group, with around half voting Labour. In 2017 Labour lost about 1 in 5 of these to the Conservatives, with a smaller chunk going to the Liberal Democrats. Smaller numbers of 2015 Conservatives and Liberal Democrats also shifted to Labour, cancelling out some of these loses, and altogether Labour won about 4 in 10 of No/Remain voters in 2017. As a result of picking up a large number of Labour voters, and 3 in 10 2015 Liberal Democrats, the Conservatives increased their share of this group of voters from two in ten to three in ten between 2015 and 2017. Although nationally the Conservatives were more clearly associated with a hard Brexit, the softer approach from the Scottish party, together with a strong position against a second independence referendum and Ruth Davidson’s effective leadership, clearly resonated with this group.

No/Leave voters (21%)

No/Leave voters, whose referendum votes are most in line with the Conservative positions on independence and Brexit (post-EU referendum), were almost evenly split between the Conservatives and Labour in 2015 (though the Conservatives had a slight edge). In 2017 the Conservatives picked up nearly half the 2015 Labour voters, six in ten 2015 Liberal Democrats, and the vast majority of 2015 UKIP voters. Combined this nearly doubled the Conservative share of the vote in this group, with nearly two-thirds voting Conservative in 2017.

Referendums and the remaking of Scottish politics

In the space of three general elections, the Scottish party system has been completely transformed. The SNP moved from third place in 2010 to first in 2015 and 2017, Labour has fallen from first to third, and the Conservatives have risen from fourth to second. It is not hard to see how the referendums on Scottish independence and the UK’s membership of the EU have been the catalyst for these changes.

In 2015 the Yes side rapidly shifted to the SNP. In 2017, Yes/Remain voters stayed loyal to the SNP but they suffered heavy losses amongst Yes/Leave voters. The relative success of the Conservative in attracting a substantial minority of No/Remain voters (33%, compared to Labour’s 43%) in spite of the national party’s hard line position on Brexit made a significant contribution to their increase in vote share. In contrast, Labour performed relatively poorly amongst the No/leave group, losing a large proportion of voters to the Conservatives. The ability of the Conservatives to capture No/Remain voters as well as No/Leave voters is may be partly attributable to their strong campaign, but also reflects the relative importance of the two referendums in defining Scottish voters political identities.

We asked a battery of question about identification with the Yes/No side in the Scottish referendum (in wave 11) and with the Leave/Remain side in the EU referendum (based on similar questions relating to social identities) and found that a large number of No/Remain voters more closely identified with ‘No’ than with ‘Remain’ (39%). Amongst this group the Conservatives led Labour by 45%-34%. Among those who identified more strongly as ‘Remain’ than ‘No’ (36%), Labour led the Conservatives 53% to 20%.

The last few years of Scottish politics have a clear tale to tell: referendums that cut across party lines can lead to major disturbances in the party system.

The British Election Study 2015 is managed by a consortium of The University of Manchester, The University of Oxford and The University of Nottingham. The Scientific Leadership Team is comprised of Professors Ed Fieldhouse, Jane Green, Hermann Schmitt, Geoff Evans and Cees van der Eijk. The team is supported by researchers Dr Jon Mellon and Dr Chris Prosser and also by BES 2015 consultant Professor John Curtice (University of Strathclyde). The BES 2015 is working in close collaboration with colleagues within the Universities of Manchester, Oxford and Nottingham, and is partnering with a wide variety of affiliated datasets and projects (and proposed projects) to link BES voter data to other data on election candidates and campaigns.

 

Scotland welcomes Syrian refugees

One in four Syrian refugees settles in Scotland

syria children

New figures have revealed that Scotland has welcomed just over 25% of the total number of Syrian refugees that have arrived in the UK through the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme (SVPRP) since 2015.

Since the SVPRP scheme was expanded in 2015, 7,055 Syrians have arrived in the UK in total, 1,800 of whom have settled in Scotland.

This news comes the same week it was revealed the UK Government has not taken in any child refugees under the Lord Dubs scheme this year, despite committing to resettle 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Syria by 2020.

Commenting, Northern and Leith MSP Ben Macpherson said: “It’s excellent that Scotland has welcomed over a quarter of those Syrian refugees who have arrived in the UK, under the resettlement programme, since 2015.

“But more needs to be done – in what is an off-the-scale humanitarian crisis that’s difficult to comprehend here at home.

“A recent all-party inquiry revealed that the UK public would not tolerate the UK Government turning away from this humanitarian crisis if they were more aware of what was happening. It also reported that UK ministers have done “as little as legally possible” to help unaccompanied lone children who have fled war and conflict, which has left them vulnerable to trafficking.

“It’s time for the UK Government to significantly step up its refugee resettlement efforts in the midst of what is possibly the worst humanitarian crisis since the Second World War.”

syria2

In a separate development, the Scottish and Welsh Governments have written jointly to the UK Minister for Immigration expressing concern about the treatment of unaccompanied child refugees.

Cabinet Secretary for Communities, Social Security and Equalities, Angela Constance and Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Children, Carl Sargeant sent the following letter to Brandon Lewis, urging the UK Government to take into consideration the views and issues of the devolved Governments:

Dear Brandon,

Thank you very much for the time you have taken to meet with both of us on separate occasions over the summer months. We both look forward to working with you and we wish you well in this new portfolio. With regard to the meetings which have taken place, you have and will be hearing from both of us separately on the issues that were raised.

Both the Welsh Government and the Scottish Government are subject to UK Government process and procedure with regard to s67 of the Immigration Act 2016 (the Dubs amendment); and, s69-72 of the Act (transfer protocol and national transfer mechanism). Due to our mutual responsibilities for these areas in our devolved legislatures, we thought it would be helpful for all parties if we laid out our thoughts to you jointly.

With regard to s67, we have discussed these matters and our experience so far has been the same. From the start of the implementation of this scheme, we have struggled with the lack of information that has been forthcoming from those running this operation. This continues to be the case and we are aware that only a couple of hundred unaccompanied children have been transferred of the 480 placements identified. We are aware of the difficult circumstances that the emergency clearance of the Calais camps led to, and that at present, you are awaiting the outcome of the judicial review which makes it difficult to comment. However, we both feel that overall, the lack of planning and sharing of useful information from coordinators has inhibited our ability to plan ahead. We are seeking assurances from you that steps have been taken or are being put into place to mitigate against a repeat of these circumstances.

We understand you were meeting with your counterpart Ministers in the Member States as a means of resolving the transfer delays and we hope these meetings have achieved a positive outcome.

Separately, we would also like to refer to s69-72 of the Act which would put the National Transfer Mechanism onto a statutory footing in Wales and Scotland. We have discussed with you the requirement for a SI derives from the legal advice that our local authorities have received which describes a local authority’s liability requiring legislative underpinning. We understand this will result in the necessary timetable which allows for parliamentary process and we were pleased to hear of your commitment to pursuing this. We both remain committed to this piece of work and look forward to a satisfactory outcome.

We also note the report of the Human Trafficking Inquiry, initiated by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Human Trafficking and Modern Day Slavery, published on 10 July. We highlight statements with which we agree, and whilst we appreciate there is a difference in opinion as to the why and the how from the UK Government perspective, these statements provide for an outcome which we can all support, that of supporting vulnerable unaccompanied children:

‘The inquiry found no evidence that providing a safe route for children to travel to the UK acted as a ‘pull factor’ or encouraged traffickers. Instead the evidence showed that leaving children without safe and legal options left them in limbo, stranded in dangerous and often violent situations. In many instances this resulted in children turning to smugglers, putting themselves at risk of dangerous journeys and of exploitation to pay the smugglers.’

And the recommendation which says: The ‘Dubs scheme’, or Section 67 of the Immigration Act, needs to be open to children in practice and more children need to be included. This will require expanding the criteria so that it doesn’t exclude vulnerable children due to their age or nationality and a revised cut-off date. Most urgent is the quick and transparent processing of these applications. The administration of the Dubs scheme requires multi-agency teams of specialists on the ground where most children are located, including Calais and Dunkirk to build confidence in safe routes and resistance to traffickers.’

We are grateful for the recent meetings we have had with you, to discuss s67 and wider refugee and asylum seeker matters and look forward to continuing our engagement with you on these important concerns for all of our Governments. We also look forward to receiving replies to our as yet unanswered correspondences.

We are copying this letter to the Home Secretary, Amber Rudd MP, the Secretary of State for Scotland, David Mundell MP and the Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP.

Yours sincerely

Carl Sargeant AC/AM                                                        Angela Constance MSP

Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Gymunedau a Phlant     Cabinet Secretary for Communities,

Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Children        Social Security and Equalities

Cc.:

Home Secretary

Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales