Former First Minister Alex Salmond will not now give evidence to today’s session of the inquiry into how the Scottish government handled complaints against him.
He was due to present his evidence to the committee this morning, but a Scottish Parliament spokesperson has confirmed that Mr Salmond’s legal advisers yesterday informed the committee he would not be attend unless his final submission was published in full.
Mr Salmond’s decision was brought about after The Scottish Parliament’s Parliamentrary Body withdrew his final submission from the Scottish Parliament website under pressure from The Crown Office, who expressed ‘grave concerns’ over it’s public presence – despite the fact that the Salmond testimony was published in The Spectator magazine some weeks ago.
The submission was later uploaded in a redacted form – but the removal of some sections would potentially hamper Mr Salmond’s ability to give full answers to committee questions which would be based on the redacted report.
The Crown Office’s role is severely criticised in the Salmond submission, in which he accuses a number of individuals and organisations of an orchestrated attempt to ‘damage my reputation and remove me from public life in Scotland’.
In his final submission, Mr Salmond says: “I leave it to others the question of what is, or is not, a conspiracy but am clear in my position that the evidence supports a deliberate, prolonged, malicious and concerted effort among a range of individuals within the Scottish Government and the SNP to damage my reputation, even to the extent of having me imprisoned.
“The individuals, for the avoidance of doubt: Peter Murrell (Chief Executive), Ian McCann (Compliance Officer) and Sue Riddick (Chief Operating Officer) of the SNP, together with Liz Llloyd, the First Minister’s Chief of Staff.
“There are others who, for legal reasons, I am not allowed to name.”
Alex Salmond’s submission concludes: “The real cost to the Scottish people runs into many millions of pounds and yet no-one in this entire process has uttered the simple words which are necessary on occasions to renew and refresh democratic institutions – “I Resign”.
“The Committee now has the opportunity to address that position.”
Mr Salmond also accuses the First Minister of both breaching the Ministerial Code and of misleading parliament in her recollection of events. If this was proven to be the case, Ms Sturgeon would be expected to resign.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon took to the airwaves on Monday evening, challenging Alex Salmond to prove there was a conspiracy against him and saying he has made claims “without a shred of evidence.”
The nine-person Holyrood committee will meet in private today to discuss how they can overcome the latest setback – their inquiry has been dogged by procedural issues and legal wrangling since it was set up in January 2019.
Mr Salmond has now offered to appear before the committee on Friday if the legal dispute over the written submission can be resolved.